PGN-Engine-Analyzer variations file:
F:\konrod.info\Schach\Kommentiertes\Engine-Varianten\Kasparov_Deep_Blue_1997_1_6.pgn
from 1 December 2024 09:36
analysis date: 9 April 2025 08:12

⇓ game 1 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇓

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

game 1
player data
PGN tags / evaluation settings	player White	player Black
name	G Kasparov	Deep Blue

⇑ game 1 — player data ⇑

⇓ game 1 — probabilistic game results ⇓

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

game 1
PGN tags / evaluation settings
PGN tags / evaluation settings	information
event/source/work	IBM Man-Machine
site	New York
date	1997.05.03
round/number/page	01
result	1-0
ECO	A07
annotator	Stockfish dev-20240928-d6043970
scheme move evaluation	7 sectors - 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/14 1/14 1/7 1/7 1/7
scheme position evaluation	9 sectors - 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/18 1/18 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9
scheme WDL evaluation relevance reduction	as per original engine WDLs or calculation
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.75	1.304 [158x]
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.875	1.937 [160x]
variations: general parameters	2 — for White/Black — from/until move no. 3 until end of game
variations: analysis stop parameter	time per game 30 half-moves
FEN position before Variations start	rn1qkbnr/ppp1pppp/8/3p4/6b1/5NP1/PPPPPP1P/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 1 3 c8g4

⇑ game 1 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇑

⇓ game 1 — engine evaluated moves ⇓

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

game 1
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

⇑ game 1 — probabilistic game results ⇑

⇓ game 1 — statistics ⇓

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

game 1
engine-evaluated moves
game no.	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = variation x	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = x.variation	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant
1																									2	2... Bg4	P	—	→ 3. Bg2	30	—	0.25	2.0%	89.3%	8.7%	⩲ +/=	53%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
1	3	3. b3 ?!	M	>2	→ 3... e6	30	—	‑0.13	2.9%	91.0%	6.1%	=	48%	0.25	0.16	‑0.38	‑0.37	?!	86.25%	86.25%	0.38	0.38	0.37	0.37	3	3... Nd7	M	>2	→ 4. h3	30	—	‑0.03	4.6%	91.6%	3.8%	=	50%	‑0.13	‑0.08	‑0.10	‑0.10		96.32%	96.32%	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.10
1	4	4. Bb2	M	>2	→ 4... Ngf6	30	—	0.01	4.3%	91.6%	4.1%	=	50%	‑0.03	‑0.04	0.04	0.04		100.00%	93.13%	0.38	0.19	0.37	0.19	4	4... e6	M	2	→ 5. d3	30	—	0.06	3.5%	91.5%	5.0%	=	51%	0.01	0.06	‑0.05	‑0.05		98.12%	97.22%	0.15	0.07	0.15	0.08
1	5	5. Bg2	M	2	→ 5... c6	30	—	0.06	5.0%	91.5%	3.5%	=	51%	0.06	0.06	0.00	0.00		100.00%	95.42%	0.38	0.13	0.37	0.12	5	5... Ngf6	M	2	→ 6. d3	30	—	0.06	3.5%	91.5%	5.0%	=	51%	0.06	0.06	0.00	0.00		100.00%	98.15%	0.15	0.05	0.15	0.05
1	6	6. O‑O	M	2	→ 6... Be7	30	—	0.02	4.5%	91.6%	3.9%	=	50%	0.06	0.02	‑0.04	‑0.04		98.50%	96.19%	0.42	0.11	0.41	0.10	6	6... c6	M	>2	→ 8. e4	30	—	0.23	2.1%	89.7%	8.2%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.02	0.05	‑0.21	‑0.20		92.88%	96.83%	0.36	0.09	0.35	0.09
1	7	7. d3	M	1	→ 8. e4	30	—	0.23	8.2%	89.7%	2.1%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.23	0.03	0.20	0.19		100.00%	96.95%	0.42	0.08	0.41	0.08	7	7... Bd6	M	1	→ 8. e4	30	—	0.23	2.1%	89.7%	8.2%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.10	0.23	‑0.13	‑0.12		95.64%	96.59%	0.49	0.10	0.47	0.09
1	8	8. Nbd2 ?!	M	>2	→ 9. c4	30	—	‑0.17	2.5%	90.6%	6.9%	⩱ =/+	48%	0.23	0.02	‑0.40	‑0.39	?!	86.35%	95.18%	0.82	0.14	0.80	0.13	8	8... O‑O	M	1	→ 9. c4	30	—	‑0.17	6.9%	90.6%	2.5%	=	48%	‑0.17	‑0.10	0.07	0.07		100.00%	97.16%	0.49	0.08	0.47	0.08
1	9	9. h3	M	2	→ 10. c4	30	—	‑0.10	3.1%	91.3%	5.6%	=	49%	‑0.10	‑0.17	0.07	0.07		100.00%	95.87%	0.82	0.12	0.80	0.11	9	9... Bh5	M	1	→ 10. c4	30	—	‑0.10	5.6%	91.3%	3.1%	=	49%	‑0.10	0.11	0.21	0.21		100.00%	97.57%	0.49	0.07	0.47	0.07
1	10	10. e3	M	>2	→ 11. g4	30	—	‑0.13	2.8%	91.0%	6.2%	=	48%	‑0.10	‑0.13	‑0.03	‑0.03		99.00%	96.26%	0.85	0.11	0.83	0.10	10	10... h6	M	1	→ 11. g4	30	—	‑0.13	6.2%	91.0%	2.8%	=	48%	‑0.13	‑0.13	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.87%	0.49	0.06	0.47	0.06
1	11	11. Qe1	M	>2	→ 11... e5	30	—	‑0.23	2.1%	89.7%	8.2%	⩱ =/+	47%	‑0.13	‑0.32	‑0.10	‑0.10		96.75%	96.32%	0.95	0.11	0.93	0.10	11	11... Qa5	M	>2	→ 12... Qc7	30	—	‑0.02	4.5%	91.6%	3.9%	=	50%	‑0.23	‑0.21	‑0.21	‑0.20		93.08%	97.34%	0.70	0.08	0.67	0.07
1	12	12. a3 ?!	M	1	→ 12... Qc7	30	—	‑0.02	3.9%	91.6%	4.5%	=	50%	0.25	‑0.02	‑0.27	‑0.26	?!	91.10%	95.80%	1.22	0.12	1.19	0.12	12	12... Bc7 ?!	M	>2	→ 13. b4	30	—	0.23	2.1%	89.7%	8.2%	⩲ +/=	53%	‑0.02	0.13	‑0.25	‑0.24	?!	91.72%	96.78%	0.95	0.10	0.91	0.09
1	13	13. Nh4	M	>2	→ 14... Qb6	30	—	0.13	6.2%	91.0%	2.8%	=	52%	0.23	0.20	‑0.10	‑0.10		96.75%	95.88%	1.32	0.12	1.29	0.12	13	13... g5	M	1	→ 14... Qb6	30	—	0.13	2.8%	91.0%	6.2%	=	52%	0.13	0.18	0.05	0.05		100.00%	97.07%	0.95	0.09	0.91	0.08
1	14	14. Nhf3 !?	M	1	→ 14... Qb6	30	—	0.13	6.2%	91.0%	2.8%	=	52%	0.13	‑0.25	0.38	0.37	!?	100.00%	96.23%	1.32	0.11	1.29	0.11	14	14... e5	M	2	→ 15. b4	30	—	0.17	2.5%	90.6%	6.9%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.13	0.17	‑0.04	‑0.04		98.68%	97.20%	0.99	0.08	0.95	0.08
1	15	15. e4	M	>2	→ 16. Rc1	30	—	0.04	4.7%	91.6%	3.7%	=	51%	0.17	0.17	‑0.13	‑0.13		95.67%	96.18%	1.45	0.11	1.42	0.11	15	15... Rfe8	M	1	→ 16. Rc1	30	—	0.04	3.7%	91.6%	4.7%	=	51%	0.04	0.25	0.21	0.20		100.00%	97.42%	0.99	0.08	0.95	0.07
1	16	16. Nh2 ?!	M	>2	→ 16... Qc5	30	—	‑0.37	1.3%	86.4%	12.3%	⩱ =/+	45%	0.04	0.03	‑0.41	‑0.39	?!	86.18%	95.47%	1.86	0.13	1.81	0.13	16	16... Qb6 ?!	M	>2	→ 17. Ng4	30	—	0.13	2.8%	91.0%	6.2%	=	52%	‑0.37	‑0.25	‑0.50	‑0.48	?!	83.05%	96.39%	1.49	0.11	1.43	0.10
1	17	17. Qc1	M	>2	→ 18... Kh7	30	—	0.00	4.2%	91.6%	4.2%	=	50%	0.13	0.08	‑0.13	‑0.13		95.61%	95.48%	1.99	0.13	1.94	0.13	17	17... a5	M	1	→ 18... Kh7	30	—	0.00	4.2%	91.6%	4.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.01	0.01	0.01		100.00%	96.63%	1.49	0.10	1.43	0.10
1	18	18. Re1 !?	M	1	→ 18... Kh7	30	—	0.00	4.2%	91.6%	4.2%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.37	0.37	0.35	!?	100.00%	95.76%	1.99	0.12	1.94	0.12	18	18... Bd6	M	>2	→ 19. Nhf1	30	—	0.15	2.6%	90.8%	6.6%	=	52%	0.00	0.07	‑0.15	‑0.15		94.95%	96.53%	1.64	0.10	1.58	0.10
1	19	19. Ndf1	M	2	→ 19... Bc5	30	—	0.06	5.0%	91.5%	3.5%	=	51%	0.15	0.06	‑0.09	‑0.09		97.00%	95.83%	2.08	0.12	2.03	0.12	19	19... dxe4	M	2	→ 21. Qd2	30	—	0.01	3.4%	93.0%	3.6%	=	50%	0.01	0.06	0.05	0.05		100.00%	96.73%	1.64	0.10	1.58	0.09
1	20	20. dxe4	M	1	→ 21. Qd2	30	—	0.01	3.6%	93.0%	3.4%	=	50%	0.01	0.00	0.01	0.01		100.00%	96.06%	2.08	0.12	2.03	0.11	20	20... Bc5	M	1	→ 21. Qd2	30	—	0.01	3.4%	93.0%	3.6%	=	50%	0.00	0.01	‑0.01	‑0.01		99.63%	96.89%	1.65	0.09	1.59	0.09
1	21	21. Ne3	M	2	→ 22. Qd2	30	—	0.00	3.6%	92.9%	3.5%	=	50%	0.01	0.00	‑0.01	‑0.01		99.63%	96.25%	2.09	0.11	2.04	0.11	21	21... Rad8	M	1	→ 22. Qd2	30	—	0.00	3.6%	92.9%	3.5%	=	50%	0.00	0.09	0.09	0.09		100.00%	97.06%	1.65	0.09	1.59	0.08
1	22	22. Nhf1	M	>2	→ 22... Bg6	30	—	‑0.16	2.1%	92.0%	5.9%	=	48%	0.00	0.00	‑0.16	‑0.16		94.72%	96.18%	2.25	0.11	2.20	0.11	22	22... g4 ?	M	>2	→ 23. Nd2	30	—	0.88	0.2%	59.8%	40.0%	+-	70%	‑0.16	‑0.04	‑1.04	‑0.88	?	66.16%	95.51%	2.69	0.13	2.47	0.12
1	23	23. hxg4	M	2	→ 23... Bxg4	30	3	0.70	26.2%	73.5%	0.3%	± +/-	63%	0.88	0.70	‑0.18	‑0.12		95.37%	96.14%	2.43	0.12	2.32	0.11	23	23... Nxg4	M	2	→ 24. Bf3	30	18	0.87	0.1%	61.2%	38.7%	+-	69%	0.70	0.87	‑0.17	‑0.12		95.58%	95.51%	2.86	0.14	2.59	0.12
1	24	24. f3	M	2	→ 25... Kh7	30	—	0.77	28.5%	71.4%	0.1%	± +/-	64%	0.87	0.77	‑0.10	‑0.07		97.45%	96.20%	2.53	0.12	2.39	0.11	24	24... Nxe3	M	1	→ 25... Kh7	30	—	0.77	0.1%	71.4%	28.5%	± +/-	64%	0.77	0.86	0.09	0.06		100.00%	95.72%	2.86	0.13	2.59	0.12
1	25	25. Nxe3 !!	M	1	→ 25... Kh7	30	—	0.77	28.5%	71.4%	0.1%	± +/-	64%	0.77	‑0.47	1.24	1.13	!!	100.00%	96.36%	2.53	0.11	2.39	0.10	25	25... Be7	M	2	→ 26. Rb1	30	—	0.77	0.1%	71.9%	28.0%	± +/-	64%	0.77	0.77	0.00	0.00		100.00%	95.90%	2.86	0.12	2.59	0.11
1	26	26. Kh1 ?!	M	2	→ 27. Qd2	30	1	0.39	7.8%	91.8%	0.4%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.77	0.39	‑0.38	‑0.31	?!	88.26%	96.02%	2.91	0.12	2.70	0.11	26	26... Bg5 !?	M	1	→ 27. Qd2	30	1	0.39	0.4%	91.8%	7.8%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.39	0.86	0.47	0.37	!?	100.00%	96.08%	2.86	0.12	2.59	0.11
1	27	27. Re2 ?!	M	2	→ 29. Qe1	30	1	0.00	1.7%	96.6%	1.7%	=	50%	0.39	0.00	‑0.39	‑0.38	?!	86.38%	95.64%	3.30	0.13	3.08	0.12	27	27... a4 !?	M	1	→ 29. Qe1	30	1	0.00	1.7%	96.6%	1.7%	=	50%	0.00	0.36	0.36	0.35	!?	100.00%	96.23%	2.86	0.11	2.59	0.10
1	28	28. b4 !?	M	1	→ 29. Qe1	30	1	0.00	1.7%	96.6%	1.7%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.22	0.22	0.22	!?	100.00%	95.81%	3.30	0.13	3.08	0.12	28	28... f5 !?	M	1	→ 29. Qe1	30	1	0.00	1.7%	96.6%	1.7%	=	50%	0.00	0.36	0.36	0.35	!?	100.00%	96.38%	2.86	0.11	2.59	0.10
1	29	29. exf5	M	2	→ 32... Rd7	30	—	0.00	0.8%	98.4%	0.8%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	95.96%	3.30	0.12	3.08	0.11	29	29... e4	M	1	→ 32... Rd7	30	—	0.00	0.8%	98.4%	0.8%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.51%	2.86	0.11	2.59	0.10
1	30	30. f4 !!	M	1	→ 32... Rd7	30	—	0.00	0.8%	98.4%	0.8%	=	50%	0.00	‑3.91	3.91	1.27	!!	100.00%	96.11%	3.30	0.12	3.08	0.11	30	30... Bxe2 !!	M	1	→ 32... Rd7	30	—	0.00	0.8%	98.4%	0.8%	=	50%	0.00	1.93	1.93	0.99	!!	100.00%	96.64%	2.86	0.10	2.59	0.09
1	31	31. fxg5 !!	M	1	→ 32... Rd7	30	—	0.00	0.8%	98.4%	0.8%	=	50%	0.00	‑2.68	2.68	1.24	!!	100.00%	96.24%	3.30	0.11	3.08	0.11	31	31... Ne5 !!	M	1	→ 32... Rd7	30	—	0.00	0.8%	98.4%	0.8%	=	50%	0.00	2.27	2.27	1.14	!!	100.00%	96.75%	2.86	0.10	2.59	0.09
1	32	32. g6 !?	M	1	→ 32... Rd7	30	—	0.00	0.8%	98.4%	0.8%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.31	0.31	0.31	!?	100.00%	96.37%	3.30	0.11	3.08	0.10	32	32... Bf3	M	2	→ 33. Qe1	30	13	0.13	0.4%	98.2%	1.4%	=	51%	0.00	0.13	‑0.13	‑0.13		94.90%	96.69%	2.99	0.10	2.72	0.09
1	33	33. Bc3	M	>2	→ 33... Rd6	30	42	0.00	0.8%	98.4%	0.8%	=	50%	0.13	0.00	‑0.13	‑0.13		94.90%	96.32%	3.43	0.11	3.21	0.10	33	33... Qb5 ?	M	>2	→ 34. Qe1	30	23	0.86	0.0%	65.9%	34.1%	+-	67%	0.00	0.00	‑0.86	‑0.71	?	71.01%	95.86%	3.85	0.12	3.43	0.11
1	34	34. Qf1 ?	M	>2	→ 34... h5	30	768	0.00	0.8%	98.4%	0.8%	=	50%	0.86	0.59	‑0.86	‑0.71	?	71.01%	95.53%	4.29	0.13	3.92	0.12	34	34... Qxf1+ ?	M	2	→ 36... Ng4	30	37	1.00	0.0%	49.3%	50.7%	+-	75%	0.00	1.00	‑1.00	‑0.75	?	65.08%	94.90%	4.85	0.15	4.18	0.13
1	35	35. Rxf1 !!	M	1	→ 36... Ng4	30	37	1.00	50.7%	49.3%	0.0%	+-	75%	1.00	‑2.15	3.15	1.78	!!	100.00%	95.66%	4.29	0.13	3.92	0.12	35	35... h5	M	1	→ 36... Ng4	30	37	1.00	0.0%	49.3%	50.7%	++-	75%	1.00	1.34	0.34	0.10		100.00%	95.05%	4.85	0.15	4.18	0.13
1	36	36. Kg1 !	M	1	→ 36... Ng4	30	37	1.00	50.7%	49.3%	0.0%	+-	75%	1.00	0.24	0.76	0.56	!	100.00%	95.79%	4.29	0.13	3.92	0.12	36	36... Kf8	M	2	→ 37. b5	30	159	1.41	0.0%	8.7%	91.3%	++-	96%	1.00	1.41	‑0.41	‑0.12		93.43%	95.01%	5.26	0.15	4.30	0.13
1	37	37. Bh3	M	2	→ 38... Re7	30	5204	2.57	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	2.57	1.41	1.16	0.04		100.00%	95.91%	4.29	0.12	3.92	0.11	37	37... b5	M	1	→ 38... Re7	30	5204	2.57	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	2.23	2.57	‑0.34	0.00		100.00%	95.15%	5.60	0.16	4.30	0.12
1	38	38. Kf2	M	1	→ 38... Re7	30	5204	2.57	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	2.57	1.40	1.17	0.04		100.00%	96.02%	4.29	0.12	3.92	0.11	38	38... Kg7	M	>2	→ 39... h4	30	1417	4.11	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	2.57	2.67	‑1.54	0.00		100.00%	95.28%	7.14	0.20	4.30	0.12
1	39	39. g4	M	1	→ 39... h4	30	1417	4.11	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	4.11	3.54	0.57	0.00		100.00%	96.13%	4.29	0.12	3.92	0.11	39	39... Kh6	M	2	→ 40. gxh5	30	950	4.50	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	4.11	4.50	‑0.39	0.00		100.00%	95.41%	7.53	0.20	4.30	0.12
1	40	40. Rg1	M	2	→ 41... Nxg4+	30	12956	5.11	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	5.11	4.50	0.61	0.00		100.00%	96.23%	4.29	0.11	3.92	0.10	40	40... hxg4	M	1	→ 41... Nxg4+	30	12956	5.11	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	4.82	5.11	‑0.29	0.00		100.00%	95.53%	7.82	0.21	4.30	0.11
1	41	41. Bxg4	M	1	→ 41... Nxg4+	30	12956	5.11	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	5.11	2.90	2.21	0.00		100.00%	96.33%	4.29	0.11	3.92	0.10	41	41... Bxg4	M	2	→ 43... e3+	30	4157	5.24	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	5.11	5.24	‑0.13	0.00		100.00%	95.65%	7.95	0.20	4.30	0.11
1	42	42. Nxg4+	M	1	→ 43... e3+	30	4157	5.24	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	5.24	5.01	0.23	0.00		100.00%	96.42%	4.29	0.11	3.92	0.10	42	42... Nxg4+	M	1	→ 43... e3+	30	4157	5.24	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	5.24	6.63	1.39	0.00		100.00%	95.76%	7.95	0.20	4.30	0.11
1	43	43. Rxg4 !!	M	1	→ 43... e3+	30	4157	5.24	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	5.24	‑3.20	8.44	2.32	!!	100.00%	96.51%	4.29	0.10	3.92	0.10	43	43... Rd5	M	>2	→ 44... Kh5	30	3888	5.38	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	5.24	5.30	‑0.14	0.00		100.00%	95.86%	8.09	0.20	4.30	0.10
1	44	44. f6 !!	M	1	→ 44... Kh5	30	3888	5.38	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	5.38	0.26	5.12	1.02	!!	100.00%	96.59%	4.29	0.10	3.92	0.09	44	44... Rd1	M	>2	→ 45. g7	30	3233	8.44	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	5.38	5.38	‑3.06	0.00		100.00%	95.96%	11.15	0.27	4.30	0.10
1	45	45. g7	M	1	↓	30	3233	8.44	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	8.44	7.90	0.54	0.00		100.00%	96.67%	4.29	0.10	3.92	0.09

⇑ game 1 — engine evaluated moves ⇑

⇓ game 2 — player data ⇓

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

game 1
statistics
type	player White	player Black
moves with own (↓) or from following move derived (→) precise engine evaluation	43	43
moves without precise engine evaluation	—	—
phantom moves without own, but from the following move derived (→) engine evaluation	—	1
optimal moves — evaluation gain ≧ 0.00	24	19
suboptimal moves — evaluation loss > 0.00 — evaluation gain < 0.00	19	23
brilliant moves !!	6	2
impressive moves !	1	—
attractive moves !?	4	3
neutral moves — relevant gain/loss <> 0.00	18	20
neutral moves with engine evaluation = 0.00 or for lack of comparative variation ≧ 0.00	7	12
questionable moves ?!	6	2
unsuitable moves ?	1	3
extreme advantage — of White: ++- — of Black: --+	9	—
clear advantage — of White: +- — of Black: -+	2	—
moderate advantage — of White: ± — of Black: ∓	3	—
slight advantage — of White: ⩲ — of Black: ⩱	2	—
balanced position — engine evaluation <> 0.00 — =	13	14
balanced position or draw — engine evaluation = 0.00 — =	11	7
slight disadvantage — of White: ⩱ — of Black: ⩲	3	6
moderate disadvantage — of White: ∓ — of Black: ±	—	2
clear disadvantage — of White: -+ — of Black: +-	—	4
extreme disadvantage — of White: --+ — of Black: ++-	—	10
engine evaluation at last move — »evaluation real move«	8.44	8.44
win probability as per WDL at last move — »win probability WDL«	100.0%	0.0%
draw probability as per WDL at last move — »draw probability WDL«	0.0%	0.0%
loss probability as per WDL at last move — »loss probability WDL«	0.0%	100.0%
position evaluation symbol at last move — »position evaluation symbol«	++-	++-
probabilistic game result at last move in % — »probab. game result«	100%	100%
average optimum rate at last move in % — »optimum rate Ø«	96.67%	95.96%
cumulated absolute losses at last move — »losses ∑ absolute«	4.29	11.15
average absolute losses at last move — »losses Ø absolute«	0.10	0.27
cumulated relevant losses at last move — »losses ∑ relevant«	3.92	4.30
average relevant losses at last move — »losses Ø relevant«	0.09	0.10
moves with engine/calculation-WDL-ERR analysis	43	43

⇑ game 1 — statistics ⇑

⇓ game 2 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 2
player data
PGN tags / evaluation settings	player White	player Black
name	Deep Blue	Kasparov,G

⇑ game 2 — player data ⇑

⇓ game 2 — probabilistic game results ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 2
PGN tags / evaluation settings
PGN tags / evaluation settings	information
event/source/work	IBM Man-Machine
site	New York
date	1997.05.04
round/number/page	02
result	1-0
ECO	C93
annotator	Stockfish dev-20241031-24c57793
scheme move evaluation	7 sectors - 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/14 1/14 1/7 1/7 1/7
scheme position evaluation	9 sectors - 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/18 1/18 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9
scheme WDL evaluation relevance reduction	as per original engine WDLs or calculation
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.75	1.173 [139x]
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.875	1.757 [143x]
variations: general parameters	2 — for White/Black — from/until move no. 3 until end of game
variations: analysis stop parameter	depth 30 half-moves
FEN position before Variations start	r1bqkbnr/pppp1ppp/2n5/4p3/4P3/5N2/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 2 3 b8c6

⇑ game 2 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇑

⇓ game 2 — engine evaluated moves ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 2
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

⇑ game 2 — probabilistic game results ⇑

⇓ game 2 — statistics ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 2
engine-evaluated moves
game no.	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = variation x	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = x.variation	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant
2																									2	2... Nc6	P	—	→ 3... Nf6	30	—	0.23	2.1%	89.5%	8.4%	⩲ +/=	53%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2	3	3. Bb5	M	1	↓	30	—	0.23	8.4%	89.5%	2.1%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.23	0.17	0.06	0.06		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	3	3... a6	M	2	→ 5... Nxe4	30	—	0.19	2.4%	90.3%	7.3%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.19	0.20	0.01	0.01		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
2	4	4. Ba4	M	1	→ 5... Nxe4	30	—	0.19	7.3%	90.3%	2.4%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.19	0.00	0.19	0.19		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	4	4... Nf6	M	1	→ 5... Nxe4	30	—	0.19	2.4%	90.3%	7.3%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.19	0.35	0.16	0.15		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
2	5	5. O‑O	M	1	→ 5... Nxe4	30	—	0.19	7.3%	90.3%	2.4%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.19	0.08	0.11	0.11		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	5	5... Be7	M	>2	→ 7... O-O	30	—	0.27	1.8%	89.0%	9.2%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.19	0.26	‑0.08	‑0.08		97.56%	99.19%	0.08	0.03	0.08	0.03
2	6	6. Re1	M	1	→ 7... O-O	30	—	0.27	9.2%	89.0%	1.8%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.27	0.24	0.03	0.03		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	6	6... b5	M	1	→ 7... O-O	30	—	0.27	1.8%	89.0%	9.2%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.27	0.42	0.15	0.13		100.00%	99.39%	0.08	0.02	0.08	0.02
2	7	7. Bb3 !!	M	1	→ 7... O-O	30	—	0.27	9.2%	89.0%	1.8%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.27	‑3.28	3.55	1.69	!!	100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	7	7... d6	M	2	→ 9... Bb7	30	—	0.29	1.7%	88.6%	9.7%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.27	0.29	‑0.02	‑0.02		99.40%	99.39%	0.10	0.02	0.10	0.02
2	8	8. c3	M	1	→ 9... Bb7	30	—	0.29	9.7%	88.6%	1.7%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.29	0.26	0.03	0.03		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	8	8... O‑O	M	1	→ 9... Bb7	30	—	0.29	1.7%	88.6%	9.7%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.29	0.41	0.12	0.11		100.00%	99.49%	0.10	0.02	0.10	0.02
2	9	9. h3	M	1	→ 9... Bb7	30	—	0.29	9.7%	88.6%	1.7%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.29	0.20	0.09	0.08		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	9	9... h6	M	>2	→ 11... Bd7	30	—	0.41	1.2%	85.2%	13.6%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.29	0.32	‑0.12	‑0.11		96.48%	99.06%	0.22	0.03	0.21	0.03
2	10	10. d4	M	1	→ 11... Bd7	30	—	0.41	13.6%	85.2%	1.2%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.41	0.25	0.16	0.14		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	10	10... Re8	M	1	→ 11... Bd7	30	—	0.41	1.2%	85.2%	13.6%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.41	0.46	0.05	0.04		100.00%	99.18%	0.22	0.03	0.21	0.03
2	11	11. Nbd2	M	1	→ 11... Bd7	30	—	0.41	13.6%	85.2%	1.2%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.41	0.27	0.14	0.13		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	11	11... Bf8	M	2	→ 12... Na5	30	—	0.62	0.6%	76.1%	23.3%	± +/-	61%	0.41	0.62	‑0.21	‑0.17		94.18%	98.62%	0.43	0.05	0.38	0.04
2	12	12. Nf1 !?	M	1	→ 12... Na5	30	—	0.62	23.3%	76.1%	0.6%	± +/-	61%	0.62	0.35	0.27	0.23	!?	100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	12	12... Bd7	M	>2	→ 14... Nc4	30	—	0.57	0.7%	78.7%	20.6%	± +/-	60%	0.62	0.64	0.05	0.04		100.00%	98.76%	0.43	0.04	0.38	0.04
2	13	13. Ng3	M	1	→ 14... Nc4	30	—	0.57	20.6%	78.7%	0.7%	± +/-	60%	0.57	0.43	0.14	0.12		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	13	13... Na5	M	1	→ 14... Nc4	30	—	0.57	0.7%	78.7%	20.6%	± +/-	60%	0.57	0.62	0.05	0.04		100.00%	98.87%	0.43	0.04	0.38	0.03
2	14	14. Bc2 !?	M	1	→ 14... Nc4	30	—	0.57	20.6%	78.7%	0.7%	± +/-	60%	0.57	‑0.04	0.61	0.55	!?	100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	14	14... c5	M	2	→ 15. d5	30	—	0.58	0.7%	78.0%	21.3%	± +/-	60%	0.57	0.58	‑0.01	‑0.01		99.73%	98.95%	0.44	0.04	0.39	0.03
2	15	15. b3	M	2	→ 15... cxd4	30	—	0.50	17.2%	81.9%	0.9%	⩲ +/=	58%	0.58	0.50	‑0.08	‑0.07		97.82%	99.83%	0.08	0.01	0.07	0.01	15	15... Nc6	M	>2	→ 18... Be7	30	—	0.63	0.6%	75.7%	23.7%	± +/-	62%	0.50	0.53	‑0.13	‑0.10		96.49%	98.76%	0.57	0.04	0.49	0.04
2	16	16. d5 !?	M	1	→ 18... Be7	30	—	0.63	23.7%	75.7%	0.6%	± +/-	62%	0.63	0.36	0.27	0.22	!?	100.00%	99.84%	0.08	0.01	0.07	0.01	16	16... Ne7 !?	M	1	→ 18... Be7	30	—	0.63	0.6%	75.7%	23.7%	± +/-	62%	0.63	1.27	0.64	0.34	!?	100.00%	98.85%	0.57	0.04	0.49	0.03
2	17	17. Be3	M	1	→ 18... Be7	30	—	0.63	23.7%	75.7%	0.6%	± +/-	62%	0.66	0.63	‑0.03	‑0.02		99.22%	99.80%	0.11	0.01	0.09	0.01	17	17... Ng6	M	1	→ 18... Be7	30	—	0.63	0.6%	75.7%	23.7%	± +/-	62%	0.63	0.71	0.08	0.06		100.00%	98.92%	0.57	0.04	0.49	0.03
2	18	18. Qd2	M	1	→ 18... Be7	30	—	0.63	23.7%	75.7%	0.6%	± +/-	62%	0.67	0.63	‑0.04	‑0.03		98.97%	99.75%	0.15	0.01	0.12	0.01	18	18... Nh7	M	>2	→ 19... Be7	30	—	0.63	0.6%	75.2%	24.2%	± +/-	62%	0.63	0.63	0.00	0.00		100.00%	98.99%	0.57	0.04	0.49	0.03
2	19	19. a4	M	1	→ 19... Be7	30	—	0.63	24.2%	75.2%	0.6%	± +/-	62%	0.63	0.56	0.07	0.05		100.00%	99.77%	0.15	0.01	0.12	0.01	19	19... Nh4	M	>2	→ 21. b4	30	—	0.87	0.1%	61.8%	38.1%	+-	69%	0.63	0.68	‑0.24	‑0.17		93.11%	98.64%	0.81	0.05	0.66	0.04
2	20	20. Nxh4 !?	M	1	→ 21. b4	30	—	0.87	38.1%	61.8%	0.1%	+-	69%	0.87	0.47	0.40	0.29	!?	100.00%	99.78%	0.15	0.01	0.12	0.01	20	20... Qxh4 !	M	1	→ 21. b4	30	—	0.87	0.1%	61.8%	38.1%	± +/-	69%	0.87	4.05	3.18	0.58	!	100.00%	98.72%	0.81	0.05	0.66	0.04
2	21	21. Qe2	M	2	→ 21... Rec8	30	—	0.84	36.0%	63.9%	0.1%	+-	68%	0.87	0.84	‑0.03	‑0.02		99.21%	99.75%	0.18	0.01	0.14	0.01	21	21... Qd8 ?!	M	>2	→ 22. Bd3	30	—	1.17	0.0%	34.6%	65.4%	+-	83%	0.84	0.88	‑0.33	‑0.16	?!	92.65%	98.40%	1.14	0.06	0.82	0.04
2	22	22. b4	M	2	→ 23... cxb4	30	—	1.11	59.6%	40.4%	0.0%	+-	80%	1.17	1.11	‑0.06	‑0.02		98.94%	99.71%	0.24	0.01	0.16	0.01	22	22... Qc7	M	1	→ 23... cxb4	30	—	1.11	0.0%	40.4%	59.6%	+-	80%	1.11	1.18	0.07	0.03		100.00%	98.48%	1.14	0.06	0.82	0.04
2	23	23. Rec1	M	1	→ 23... cxb4	30	—	1.11	59.6%	40.4%	0.0%	+-	80%	1.11	1.01	0.10	0.05		100.00%	99.72%	0.24	0.01	0.16	0.01	23	23... c4	M	>2	→ 26. Bd1	30	—	1.12	0.0%	38.8%	61.2%	+-	81%	1.11	1.11	‑0.01	0.00		99.82%	98.54%	1.15	0.05	0.82	0.04
2	24	24. Ra3	M	1	→ 26. Bd1	30	—	1.12	61.2%	38.8%	0.0%	+-	81%	1.12	0.92	0.20	0.10		100.00%	99.73%	0.24	0.01	0.16	0.01	24	24... Rec8	M	1	→ 26. Bd1	30	—	1.12	0.0%	38.8%	61.2%	+-	81%	1.12	1.30	0.18	0.06		100.00%	98.61%	1.15	0.05	0.82	0.04
2	25	25. Rca1	M	1	→ 26. Bd1	30	—	1.12	61.2%	38.8%	0.0%	+-	81%	1.18	1.12	‑0.06	‑0.02		98.96%	99.70%	0.30	0.01	0.18	0.01	25	25... Qd8	M	1	→ 26. Bd1	30	—	1.12	0.0%	38.8%	61.2%	+-	81%	1.12	1.13	0.01	0.00		100.00%	98.67%	1.15	0.05	0.82	0.04
2	26	26. f4 ?!	M	>2	→ 26... exf4	30	—	0.62	19.6%	80.1%	0.3%	± +/-	60%	1.12	0.99	‑0.50	‑0.30	?!	87.07%	99.17%	0.80	0.03	0.48	0.02	26	26... Nf6 ?!	M	>2	→ 27. Qf2	30	—	1.43	0.0%	17.0%	83.0%	++-	92%	0.62	0.96	‑0.81	‑0.40	?!	81.48%	97.95%	1.96	0.08	1.22	0.05
2	27	27. fxe5	M	2	→ 28. Kh2	30	—	1.25	72.3%	27.7%	0.0%	++-	86%	1.43	1.25	‑0.18	‑0.04		97.88%	99.12%	0.98	0.04	0.52	0.02	27	27... dxe5 !?	M	1	→ 28. Kh2	30	—	1.25	0.0%	27.7%	72.3%	++-	86%	1.25	2.53	1.28	0.18	!?	100.00%	98.04%	1.96	0.08	1.22	0.05
2	28	28. Qf1 ?	M	>2	→ 28... a5	30	6	0.24	5.1%	94.1%	0.8%	⩲ +/=	52%	1.25	1.17	‑1.01	‑0.62	?	70.49%	98.02%	1.99	0.08	1.14	0.04	28	28... Ne8 ?	M	>2	→ 29. Kh2	30	—	1.39	0.0%	18.2%	81.8%	++-	91%	0.24	0.83	‑1.15	‑0.65	?	67.48%	96.86%	3.11	0.12	1.87	0.07
2	29	29. Qf2	M	2	→ 30. Kh2	30	—	1.45	84.9%	15.1%	0.0%	++-	92%	1.45	1.39	0.06	0.01		100.00%	98.09%	1.99	0.07	1.14	0.04	29	29... Nd6	M	1	→ 30. Kh2	30	—	1.45	0.0%	15.1%	84.9%	++-	92%	1.34	1.45	‑0.11	‑0.02		98.92%	96.94%	3.22	0.12	1.89	0.07
2	30	30. Bb6	M	2	→ 30... Qh4	30	—	1.21	69.3%	30.7%	0.0%	++-	85%	1.45	1.21	‑0.24	‑0.05		97.07%	98.06%	2.23	0.08	1.19	0.04	30	30... Qe8	M	2	→ 31. Kh2	30	—	1.31	0.0%	22.8%	77.2%	++-	89%	1.21	1.31	‑0.10	‑0.03		98.63%	97.00%	3.32	0.12	1.92	0.07
2	31	31. R3a2	M	2	→ 31... g6	30	—	1.24	71.9%	28.1%	0.0%	++-	86%	1.31	1.24	‑0.07	‑0.02		99.08%	98.09%	2.30	0.08	1.21	0.04	31	31... Be7	M	2	→ 32. Kh2	30	—	1.30	0.0%	23.7%	76.3%	++-	88%	1.24	1.30	‑0.06	‑0.02		99.20%	97.07%	3.38	0.12	1.94	0.07
2	32	32. Bc5 ?!	M	>2	→ 32... a5	30	33	0.49	12.1%	87.6%	0.3%	± +/-	56%	1.30	1.19	‑0.81	‑0.45	?!	78.97%	97.46%	3.11	0.10	1.66	0.06	32	32... Bf8 ?	M	>2	→ 33. axb5	30	—	1.69	0.0%	6.5%	93.5%	++-	97%	0.49	1.44	‑1.20	‑0.57	?	73.21%	96.28%	4.58	0.15	2.51	0.08
2	33	33. Nf5	M	>2	→ 34... a5	30	—	1.11	62.1%	37.9%	0.0%	++-	81%	1.69	1.43	‑0.58	‑0.13		93.04%	97.31%	3.69	0.12	1.79	0.06	33	33... Bxf5 !?	M	1	→ 34... a5	30	—	1.11	0.0%	37.9%	62.1%	++-	81%	1.11	1.91	0.80	0.16	!?	100.00%	96.40%	4.58	0.15	2.51	0.08
2	34	34. exf5 !!	M	1	→ 34... a5	30	—	1.11	62.1%	37.9%	0.0%	+-	81%	1.11	‑0.40	1.51	1.23	!!	100.00%	97.40%	3.69	0.12	1.79	0.06	34	34... f6	M	2	→ 36. Qb6	30	16	1.37	0.0%	13.6%	86.4%	++-	93%	1.11	1.37	‑0.26	‑0.07		96.29%	96.39%	4.84	0.15	2.58	0.08
2	35	35. Bxd6	M	1	→ 36. Qb6	30	16	1.37	86.4%	13.6%	0.0%	++-	93%	1.43	1.37	‑0.06	‑0.01		99.53%	97.46%	3.75	0.11	1.80	0.05	35	35... Bxd6	M	1	→ 36. Qb6	30	16	1.37	0.0%	13.6%	86.4%	++-	93%	1.37	5.07	3.70	0.07		100.00%	96.50%	4.84	0.15	2.58	0.08
2	36	36. axb5	M	2	→ 36... e4	30	27	1.03	53.8%	46.2%	0.0%	++-	77%	1.37	1.03	‑0.34	‑0.10		94.50%	97.37%	4.09	0.12	1.90	0.06	36	36... axb5	M	2	→ 37... Rcb8	30	—	1.36	0.0%	13.6%	86.4%	++-	93%	1.03	1.36	‑0.33	‑0.10		94.64%	96.45%	5.17	0.15	2.68	0.08
2	37	37. Be4 !?	M	1	→ 37... Rcb8	30	—	1.36	86.4%	13.6%	0.0%	++-	93%	1.36	0.69	0.67	0.32	!?	100.00%	97.45%	4.09	0.12	1.90	0.05	37	37... Rxa2	M	>2	→ 38... Rd8	30	22	2.45	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	1.36	1.43	‑1.09	‑0.06		96.14%	96.44%	6.26	0.18	2.74	0.08
2	38	38. Qxa2 !!	M	1	→ 38... Rd8	30	22	2.45	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	2.45	0.19	2.26	1.05	!!	100.00%	97.52%	4.09	0.11	1.90	0.05	38	38... Qd7	M	>2	→ 39. Qa6	30	—	2.89	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	2.45	2.52	‑0.44	0.00		100.00%	96.54%	6.70	0.19	2.74	0.08
2	39	39. Qa7	M	2	→ 39... Qe8	30	37	2.94	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	2.94	2.89	0.05	0.00		100.00%	97.59%	4.09	0.11	1.90	0.05	39	39... Rc7	M	>2	→ 40. Qb8+	30	—	3.17	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	2.94	2.98	‑0.23	0.00		100.00%	96.63%	6.93	0.19	2.74	0.07
2	40	40. Qb6	M	2	→ 41. Qc6	30	1	3.32	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	3.32	3.17	0.15	0.00		100.00%	97.65%	4.09	0.11	1.90	0.05	40	40... Rb7	M	1	→ 41. Qc6	30	1	3.32	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	3.32	3.49	0.17	0.00		100.00%	96.72%	6.93	0.18	2.74	0.07
2	41	41. Ra8+	M	2	→ 41... Kh7	30	7	3.22	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	3.32	3.22	‑0.10	0.00		100.00%	97.71%	4.19	0.11	1.90	0.05	41	41... Kf7	M	2	→ 43. Kf2	30	7	3.78	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	3.22	3.78	‑0.56	0.00		100.00%	96.81%	7.49	0.19	2.74	0.07
2	42	42. Qa6	M	1	→ 43. Kf2	30	7	3.78	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	3.78	3.13	0.65	0.00		100.00%	97.77%	4.19	0.10	1.90	0.05	42	42... Qc7	M	1	→ 43. Kf2	30	7	3.78	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	3.59	3.78	‑0.19	0.00		100.00%	96.89%	7.68	0.19	2.74	0.07
2	43	43. Qc6	M	>2	→ 43... Qe7	30	4	3.67	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	3.78	3.73	‑0.11	0.00		100.00%	97.82%	4.30	0.10	1.90	0.05	43	43... Qb6+	M	>2	→ 44. Kh2	30	36	4.37	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	3.67	3.98	‑0.70	0.00		100.00%	96.96%	8.38	0.20	2.74	0.07
2	44	44. Kf1	M	>2	→ 45. Qxb6	30	462	3.37	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	4.37	3.85	‑1.00	0.00		100.00%	97.87%	5.30	0.13	1.90	0.05	44	44... Rb8	M	1	→ 45. Qxb6	30	462	3.37	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	3.37	5.35	1.98	0.00		100.00%	97.03%	8.38	0.20	2.74	0.07
2	45	45. Ra6 ?!	M	5	↓	30	462	0.96	44.8%	55.2%	0.0%	+-	72%	3.37	3.36	‑2.41	‑0.37	?!	83.32%	97.54%	7.71	0.18	2.27	0.05

⇑ game 2 — engine evaluated moves ⇑

⇓ game 3 — player data ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 2
statistics
type	player White	player Black
moves with own (↓) or from following move derived (→) precise engine evaluation	43	43
moves without precise engine evaluation	—	—
phantom moves without own, but from the following move derived (→) engine evaluation	—	1
optimal moves — evaluation gain ≧ 0.00	24	19
suboptimal moves — evaluation loss > 0.00 — evaluation gain < 0.00	19	23
brilliant moves !!	3	—
impressive moves !	—	1
attractive moves !?	5	3
neutral moves — relevant gain/loss <> 0.00	25	24
neutral moves with engine evaluation = 0.00 or for lack of comparative variation ≧ 0.00	6	10
questionable moves ?!	3	2
unsuitable moves ?	1	2
extreme advantage — of White: ++- — of Black: --+	15	—
clear advantage — of White: +- — of Black: -+	8	—
moderate advantage — of White: ± — of Black: ∓	9	—
slight advantage — of White: ⩲ — of Black: ⩱	11	—
slight disadvantage — of White: ⩱ — of Black: ⩲	—	9
moderate disadvantage — of White: ∓ — of Black: ±	—	9
clear disadvantage — of White: -+ — of Black: +-	—	6
extreme disadvantage — of White: --+ — of Black: ++-	—	19
engine evaluation at last move — »evaluation real move«	0.96	3.37
win probability as per WDL at last move — »win probability WDL«	44.8%	0.0%
draw probability as per WDL at last move — »draw probability WDL«	55.2%	0.0%
loss probability as per WDL at last move — »loss probability WDL«	0.0%	100.0%
position evaluation symbol at last move — »position evaluation symbol«	+-	++-
probabilistic game result at last move in % — »probab. game result«	72%	100%
average optimum rate at last move in % — »optimum rate Ø«	97.54%	97.03%
cumulated absolute losses at last move — »losses ∑ absolute«	7.71	8.38
average absolute losses at last move — »losses Ø absolute«	0.18	0.20
cumulated relevant losses at last move — »losses ∑ relevant«	2.27	2.74
average relevant losses at last move — »losses Ø relevant«	0.05	0.07
moves with engine/calculation-WDL-ERR analysis	43	43

⇑ game 2 — statistics ⇑

⇓ game 3 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 3
player data
PGN tags / evaluation settings	player White	player Black
name	Kasparov,G	Deep Blue

⇑ game 3 — player data ⇑

⇓ game 3 — probabilistic game results ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 3
PGN tags / evaluation settings
PGN tags / evaluation settings	information
event/source/work	IBM Man-Machine
site	New York
date	1997.05.06
round/number/page	03
result	1/2-1/2
ECO	A00
annotator	Stockfish dev-20241031-24c57793
scheme move evaluation	7 sectors - 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/14 1/14 1/7 1/7 1/7
scheme position evaluation	9 sectors - 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/18 1/18 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9
scheme WDL evaluation relevance reduction	as per original engine WDLs or calculation
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.75	1.297 [159x]
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.875	1.916 [159x]
variations: general parameters	2 — for White/Black — from/until move no. 3 until end of game
variations: analysis stop parameter	depth 30 half-moves
FEN position before Variations start	r1bqkbnr/pppp1ppp/2n5/4p3/8/3P1N2/PPP1PPPP/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 2 3 b8c6

⇑ game 3 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇑

⇓ game 3 — engine evaluated moves ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 3
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

⇑ game 3 — probabilistic game results ⇑

⇓ game 3 — statistics ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 3
engine-evaluated moves
game no.	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = variation x	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = x.variation	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant
3																									2	2... Nc6	P	—	→ 4. Nc3	30	—	0.13	2.9%	91.0%	6.1%	=	52%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
3	3	3. c4 !?	M	1	↓	30	—	0.13	6.1%	91.0%	2.9%	=	52%	0.13	‑0.12	0.25	0.25	!?	100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	3	3... Nf6	M	1	→ 3. c4	31	—	0.13	2.9%	91.0%	6.1%	=	52%	0.13	0.14	0.01	0.01		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
3	4	4. a3	M	>2	→ 4... d5	30	—	‑0.01	4.1%	91.6%	4.3%	=	50%	0.12	0.06	‑0.13	‑0.13		95.17%	97.59%	0.13	0.07	0.13	0.07	4	4... d6 ?!	M	>2	→ 5. b4	30	—	0.24	2.0%	89.6%	8.4%	⩲ +/=	53%	‑0.01	0.09	‑0.25	‑0.24	?!	90.98%	95.49%	0.25	0.13	0.24	0.12
3	5	5. Nc3 ?!	M	>2	→ 5... Nd4	30	—	0.04	4.7%	91.6%	3.7%	=	51%	0.24	0.21	‑0.20	‑0.19	?!	92.83%	96.00%	0.33	0.11	0.32	0.11	5	5... Be7	M	2	→ 6. e4	30	—	0.20	2.3%	90.1%	7.6%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.04	0.20	‑0.16	‑0.15		94.21%	95.06%	0.41	0.14	0.39	0.13
3	6	6. g3 ?!	M	2	→ 6... Nd4	30	—	0.00	4.2%	91.6%	4.2%	=	50%	0.20	0.00	‑0.20	‑0.19	?!	92.72%	95.18%	0.53	0.13	0.51	0.13	6	6... O‑O	M	2	→ 7... Nd4	30	—	0.15	2.7%	90.8%	6.5%	=	52%	0.00	0.15	‑0.15	‑0.15		94.81%	95.00%	0.56	0.14	0.54	0.14
3	7	7. Bg2	M	1	→ 7... Nd4	30	—	0.15	6.5%	90.8%	2.7%	=	52%	0.15	0.00	0.15	0.15		100.00%	96.14%	0.53	0.11	0.51	0.10	7	7... Be6 ?!	M	>2	→ 8... a5	30	—	0.40	1.2%	85.5%	13.3%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.15	0.25	‑0.25	‑0.23	?!	92.49%	94.50%	0.81	0.16	0.77	0.15
3	8	8. O‑O	M	1	→ 8... a5	30	—	0.40	13.3%	85.5%	1.2%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.40	0.32	0.08	0.07		100.00%	96.79%	0.53	0.09	0.51	0.09	8	8... Qd7	M	2	→ 9. b4	30	—	0.40	1.2%	85.6%	13.2%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.40	0.40	0.00	0.00		100.00%	95.42%	0.81	0.14	0.77	0.13
3	9	9. Ng5 ?!	M	2	→ 11... h6	30	—	0.12	6.1%	91.0%	2.9%	=	52%	0.40	0.12	‑0.28	‑0.26	?!	91.56%	96.04%	0.81	0.12	0.77	0.11	9	9... Bf5 !?	M	1	→ 11... h6	30	—	0.12	2.9%	91.0%	6.1%	=	52%	0.12	0.41	0.29	0.27	!?	100.00%	96.07%	0.81	0.12	0.77	0.11
3	10	10. e4	M	1	→ 11... h6	30	—	0.12	6.1%	91.0%	2.9%	=	52%	0.21	0.12	‑0.09	‑0.09		97.20%	96.18%	0.90	0.11	0.86	0.11	10	10... Bg4 !?	M	1	→ 11... h6	30	—	0.12	2.9%	91.0%	6.1%	=	52%	0.12	0.59	0.47	0.41	!?	100.00%	96.56%	0.81	0.10	0.77	0.10
3	11	11. f3	M	1	→ 11... h6	30	—	0.12	6.1%	91.0%	2.9%	=	52%	0.12	‑0.09	0.21	0.21		100.00%	96.61%	0.90	0.10	0.86	0.10	11	11... Bh5 ?!	M	2	→ 12. Be3	30	—	0.53	0.8%	80.6%	18.6%	± +/-	59%	0.12	0.53	‑0.41	‑0.37	?!	87.35%	95.54%	1.22	0.14	1.14	0.13
3	12	12. Nh3	M	2	→ 12... h6	30	—	0.54	19.2%	80.0%	0.8%	± +/-	59%	0.54	0.53	0.01	0.01		100.00%	96.95%	0.90	0.09	0.86	0.09	12	12... Nd4	M	2	→ 13. Be3	30	—	0.54	0.8%	80.0%	19.2%	± +/-	59%	0.54	0.54	0.00	0.00		100.00%	95.98%	1.22	0.12	1.14	0.11
3	13	13. Nf2	M	2	→ 13... c5	30	—	0.51	17.5%	81.6%	0.9%	± +/-	58%	0.54	0.51	‑0.03	‑0.02		99.11%	97.14%	0.93	0.08	0.88	0.08	13	13... h6	M	2	→ 15. a4	30	—	0.52	0.8%	80.8%	18.4%	⩲ +/=	59%	0.51	0.52	‑0.01	‑0.01		99.71%	96.32%	1.23	0.11	1.15	0.10
3	14	14. Be3	M	1	→ 15. a4	30	—	0.52	18.4%	80.8%	0.8%	⩲ +/=	59%	0.52	0.34	0.18	0.16		100.00%	97.38%	0.93	0.08	0.88	0.07	14	14... c5	M	1	→ 15. a4	30	—	0.52	0.8%	80.8%	18.4%	⩲ +/=	59%	0.52	0.58	0.06	0.05		100.00%	96.63%	1.23	0.10	1.15	0.10
3	15	15. b4	M	>2	→ 15... a6	30	—	0.39	12.9%	85.8%	1.3%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.52	0.50	‑0.13	‑0.11		96.17%	97.29%	1.06	0.08	0.99	0.08	15	15... b6 ?!	M	>2	→ 16. Rc1	30	—	0.70	0.5%	71.4%	28.1%	± +/-	64%	0.39	0.55	‑0.31	‑0.25	?!	91.13%	96.21%	1.54	0.12	1.40	0.11
3	16	16. Rb1	M	>2	→ 16... a6	30	—	0.65	25.1%	74.3%	0.6%	± +/-	62%	0.70	0.67	‑0.05	‑0.04		98.68%	97.39%	1.11	0.08	1.03	0.07	16	16... Kh8	M	>2	→ 17. h4	30	—	0.75	0.4%	68.3%	31.3%	± +/-	65%	0.65	0.71	‑0.10	‑0.07		97.38%	96.29%	1.64	0.12	1.47	0.11
3	17	17. Rb2 ?!	M	2	→ 18. h4	30	—	0.44	14.8%	84.1%	1.1%	⩲ +/=	57%	0.75	0.44	‑0.31	‑0.24	?!	91.31%	96.98%	1.42	0.09	1.27	0.08	17	17... a6	M	1	→ 18. h4	30	—	0.44	1.1%	84.1%	14.8%	⩲ +/=	57%	0.44	0.61	0.17	0.14		100.00%	96.54%	1.64	0.11	1.47	0.10
3	18	18. bxc5 ?!	M	>2	→ 20. Ng4	30	—	0.00	3.6%	92.9%	3.5%	=	50%	0.44	0.34	‑0.44	‑0.41	?!	85.98%	96.30%	1.86	0.12	1.68	0.11	18	18... bxc5 !?	M	1	→ 20. Ng4	30	—	0.00	3.6%	92.9%	3.5%	=	50%	0.00	0.43	0.43	0.40	!?	100.00%	96.75%	1.64	0.10	1.47	0.09
3	19	19. Bh3	M	1	→ 20. Ng4	30	—	0.00	3.6%	92.9%	3.5%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.16	0.16	0.16		100.00%	96.51%	1.86	0.11	1.68	0.10	19	19... Qc7	M	1	→ 20. Ng4	30	—	0.00	3.6%	92.9%	3.5%	=	50%	0.00	0.12	0.12	0.12		100.00%	96.94%	1.64	0.10	1.47	0.09
3	20	20. Bg4	M	2	→ 21. Qa4	30	—	‑0.06	2.9%	92.8%	4.3%	=	49%	0.00	‑0.06	‑0.06	‑0.06		97.98%	96.60%	1.92	0.11	1.74	0.10	20	20... Bg6 !?	M	1	→ 21. Qa4	30	—	‑0.06	4.3%	92.8%	2.9%	=	49%	‑0.06	0.22	0.28	0.27	!?	100.00%	97.11%	1.64	0.09	1.47	0.08
3	21	21. f4	M	2	→ 23. Nd5	30	63	‑0.14	1.8%	93.5%	4.7%	=	49%	‑0.06	‑0.14	‑0.08	‑0.08		97.29%	96.63%	2.00	0.11	1.82	0.10	21	21... exf4	M	1	→ 23. Nd5	30	63	‑0.14	4.7%	93.5%	1.8%	=	49%	‑0.29	‑0.14	‑0.15	‑0.14		95.26%	97.02%	1.79	0.09	1.61	0.08
3	22	22. gxf4 !?	M	1	→ 23. Nd5	30	63	‑0.14	1.8%	93.5%	4.7%	=	49%	‑0.14	‑0.74	0.60	0.50	!?	100.00%	96.80%	2.00	0.10	1.82	0.09	22	22... Qa5	M	1	→ 23. Nd5	30	63	‑0.14	4.7%	93.5%	1.8%	=	49%	‑0.14	0.00	0.14	0.14		100.00%	97.17%	1.79	0.09	1.61	0.08
3	23	23. Bd2	M	2	→ 23... Nxg4	30	183	‑0.25	1.3%	92.0%	6.7%	⩱ =/+	47%	‑0.14	‑0.25	‑0.11	‑0.11		96.26%	96.77%	2.11	0.10	1.93	0.09	23	23... Qxa3 ?!	M	>2	→ 24. Rb7	30	—	0.00	2.7%	94.6%	2.7%	=	50%	‑0.25	‑0.07	‑0.25	‑0.24	?!	91.37%	96.89%	2.04	0.10	1.85	0.09
3	24	24. Ra2 ?!	M	2	→ 25. Qxb3	30	3	‑0.26	1.1%	92.2%	6.7%	⩱ =/+	47%	0.00	‑0.26	‑0.26	‑0.25	?!	90.38%	96.48%	2.37	0.11	2.18	0.10	24	24... Qb3	M	1	→ 25. Qxb3	30	3	‑0.26	6.7%	92.2%	1.1%	⩱ =/+	47%	‑0.26	‑0.26	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.03%	2.04	0.09	1.85	0.08
3	25	25. f5	M	2	→ 26... Bh5	30	8	‑0.24	0.2%	97.8%	2.0%	⩱ =/+	49%	‑0.24	‑0.26	0.02	0.02		100.00%	96.64%	2.37	0.10	2.18	0.09	25	25... Qxd1 !?	M	1	→ 26... Bh5	30	8	‑0.24	2.0%	97.8%	0.2%	⩱ =/+	49%	‑0.24	0.17	0.41	0.40	!?	100.00%	97.16%	2.04	0.09	1.85	0.08
3	26	26. Bxd1 !?	M	1	→ 26... Bh5	30	8	‑0.24	0.2%	97.8%	2.0%	⩱ =/+	49%	‑0.24	‑0.46	0.22	0.21	!?	100.00%	96.78%	2.37	0.10	2.18	0.09	26	26... Bh7 ?!	M	2	→ 27. Kg2	30	—	0.00	0.6%	98.8%	0.6%	=	50%	‑0.24	0.00	‑0.24	‑0.24	?!	90.62%	96.89%	2.28	0.10	2.09	0.09
3	27	27. Nh3 ?!	M	>2	→ 27... Nd7	30	1	‑0.23	0.2%	97.9%	1.9%	⩱ =/+	49%	0.00	0.00	‑0.23	‑0.23	?!	90.92%	96.54%	2.60	0.10	2.41	0.10	27	27... Rfb8 ?!	M	>2	→ 28... Nc6	30	—	0.00	0.6%	98.8%	0.6%	=	50%	‑0.23	‑0.02	‑0.23	‑0.23	?!	90.92%	96.65%	2.51	0.10	2.32	0.09
3	28	28. Nf4	M	1	→ 28... Nc6	30	—	0.00	0.6%	98.8%	0.6%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.10	0.10	0.10		100.00%	96.68%	2.60	0.10	2.41	0.09	28	28... Bd8	M	2	→ 30... Nxd5	30	2	0.10	0.4%	98.6%	1.0%	=	50%	0.00	0.10	‑0.10	‑0.10		95.86%	96.62%	2.61	0.10	2.42	0.09
3	29	29. Nfd5 !?	M	1	→ 30... Nxd5	30	2	0.10	1.0%	98.6%	0.4%	=	50%	0.10	‑0.10	0.20	0.20	!?	100.00%	96.80%	2.60	0.10	2.41	0.09	29	29... Nc6	M	1	→ 30... Nxd5	30	2	0.10	0.4%	98.6%	1.0%	=	50%	0.10	0.11	0.01	0.01		100.00%	96.74%	2.61	0.10	2.42	0.09
3	30	30. Bf4 !?	M	1	→ 30... Nxd5	30	2	0.10	1.0%	98.6%	0.4%	=	50%	0.10	‑0.10	0.20	0.20	!?	100.00%	96.91%	2.60	0.09	2.41	0.09	30	30... Ne5 ?!	M	2	→ 31. Bxe5	30	7	0.35	0.1%	96.5%	3.4%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.10	0.35	‑0.25	‑0.25	?!	90.56%	96.52%	2.86	0.10	2.67	0.10
3	31	31. Ba4	M	2	→ 32. exd5	30	6	0.26	1.9%	98.0%	0.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.35	0.26	‑0.09	‑0.09		96.62%	96.90%	2.69	0.09	2.50	0.09	31	31... Nxd5	M	1	→ 32. exd5	30	6	0.26	0.1%	98.0%	1.9%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.26	0.29	0.03	0.03		100.00%	96.64%	2.86	0.10	2.67	0.09
3	32	32. Nxd5 ?!	M	2	→ 32... Bg8	30	—	0.05	0.5%	99.2%	0.3%	=	50%	0.26	0.05	‑0.21	‑0.21	?!	91.78%	96.73%	2.90	0.10	2.71	0.09	32	32... a5	M	>2	→ 33. Bxe5	30	—	0.09	0.3%	99.0%	0.7%	=	50%	0.05	0.07	‑0.04	‑0.04		98.33%	96.70%	2.90	0.10	2.71	0.09
3	33	33. Bb5	M	>2	→ 33... f6	30	—	‑0.08	0.3%	99.1%	0.6%	=	50%	0.09	0.06	‑0.17	‑0.17		92.90%	96.61%	3.07	0.10	2.88	0.09	33	33... Ra7	M	2	→ 34. Bxe5	30	1	0.01	0.4%	99.2%	0.4%	=	50%	‑0.08	0.01	‑0.09	‑0.09		96.23%	96.68%	2.99	0.10	2.80	0.09
3	34	34. Kg2	M	>2	→ 34... f6	30	1	‑0.09	0.2%	99.1%	0.7%	=	50%	0.01	0.00	‑0.10	‑0.10		95.82%	96.58%	3.17	0.10	2.98	0.09	34	34... g5	M	>2	→ 36. h4	30	—	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	‑0.09	0.03	‑0.09	‑0.09		96.24%	96.67%	3.08	0.10	2.89	0.09
3	35	35. Bxe5+ !?	M	1	→ 36. h4	30	—	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.25	0.25	0.25	!?	100.00%	96.69%	3.17	0.10	2.98	0.09	35	35... dxe5 !!	M	1	→ 36. h4	30	—	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	5.91	5.91	1.15	!!	100.00%	96.77%	3.08	0.09	2.89	0.09
3	36	36. f6	M	2	→ 38... Kh7	30	—	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.78%	3.17	0.09	2.98	0.09	36	36... Bg6 !?	M	1	→ 38... Kh7	30	—	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.26	0.26	0.26	!?	100.00%	96.87%	3.08	0.09	2.89	0.09
3	37	37. h4	M	1	→ 38... Kh7	30	—	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.88%	3.17	0.09	2.98	0.09	37	37... gxh4 !!	M	1	→ 38... Kh7	30	—	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	2.54	2.54	1.15	!!	100.00%	96.96%	3.08	0.09	2.89	0.08
3	38	38. Kh3	M	1	→ 38... Kh7	30	—	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.96%	3.17	0.09	2.98	0.08	38	38... Kg8 ?!	M	>2	→ 39. Ra4	30	58	0.18	0.1%	99.0%	0.9%	⩲ +/=	50%	0.00	0.00	‑0.18	‑0.18	?!	92.74%	96.84%	3.26	0.09	3.07	0.09
3	39	39. Kxh4	M	2	→ 40. Ra4	30	328	0.10	0.6%	99.2%	0.2%	=	50%	0.18	0.10	‑0.08	‑0.08		96.78%	96.96%	3.25	0.09	3.06	0.08	39	39... Kh7	M	1	→ 40. Ra4	30	328	0.10	0.2%	99.2%	0.6%	=	50%	0.10	0.24	0.14	0.14		100.00%	96.92%	3.26	0.09	3.07	0.08
3	40	40. Kg4	M	>2	→ 40... a4	30	—	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.10	0.09	‑0.10	‑0.10		95.84%	96.93%	3.35	0.09	3.16	0.08	40	40... Bc7 ?!	M	>2	→ 41. Ne7	30	35	0.33	0.0%	98.0%	2.0%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.00	0.00	‑0.33	‑0.33	?!	87.40%	96.67%	3.59	0.09	3.40	0.09
3	41	41. Nxc7 ?!	M	>2	→ 41... h5+	30	611	‑0.05	0.2%	99.4%	0.4%	=	50%	0.33	0.18	‑0.38	‑0.38	?!	85.46%	96.63%	3.73	0.10	3.54	0.09	41	41... Rxc7	M	2	→ 42... Rg8	30	785	‑0.06	0.4%	99.4%	0.2%	=	50%	‑0.06	‑0.05	0.01	0.01		100.00%	96.76%	3.59	0.09	3.40	0.09
3	42	42. Rxa5 !!	M	1	→ 42... Rg8	30	785	‑0.06	0.2%	99.4%	0.4%	=	50%	‑0.06	‑1.25	1.19	0.71	!!	100.00%	96.72%	3.73	0.09	3.54	0.09	42	42... Rd8	M	>2	→ 43... h5+	30	464	‑0.10	0.5%	99.3%	0.2%	=	50%	‑0.06	‑0.03	0.04	0.04		100.00%	96.84%	3.59	0.09	3.40	0.09
3	43	43. Rf3	M	1	→ 43... h5+	30	464	‑0.10	0.2%	99.3%	0.5%	=	50%	‑0.10	‑0.16	0.06	0.06		100.00%	96.80%	3.73	0.09	3.54	0.09	43	43... Kh8	M	>2	→ 44. Rg3	30	1764	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	‑0.10	‑0.06	‑0.10	‑0.10		95.85%	96.82%	3.69	0.09	3.50	0.09
3	44	44. Kh4	M	>2	→ 44... Kh7	30	703	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.88%	3.73	0.09	3.54	0.08	44	44... Kg8	M	2	→ 45. Rg3	30	8	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.89%	3.69	0.09	3.50	0.08
3	45	45. Ra3	M	>2	→ 45... Kh7	30	762	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.95%	3.73	0.09	3.54	0.08	45	45... Kh8	M	2	→ 47. Rg3	30	352	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.96%	3.69	0.09	3.50	0.08
3	46	46. Ra6	M	1	→ 47. Rg3	30	352	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.02%	3.73	0.08	3.54	0.08	46	46... Kh7	M	1	→ 47. Rg3	30	352	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.03%	3.69	0.08	3.50	0.08
3	47	47. Ra3	M	2	→ 47... h5	30	704	‑0.04	0.2%	99.5%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.04	‑0.04	‑0.04		98.30%	97.05%	3.77	0.08	3.58	0.08	47	47... Kh8	M	>2	→ 48. Ra6	30	920	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	‑0.04	0.00	‑0.04	‑0.04		98.30%	97.06%	3.73	0.08	3.54	0.08
3	48	48. Ra6	M	1	↓	30	920	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.11%	3.77	0.08	3.58	0.08

⇑ game 3 — engine evaluated moves ⇑

⇓ game 4 — player data ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 3
statistics
type	player White	player Black
moves with own (↓) or from following move derived (→) precise engine evaluation	46	46
moves without precise engine evaluation	—	—
phantom moves without own, but from the following move derived (→) engine evaluation	—	1
optimal moves — evaluation gain ≧ 0.00	23	24
suboptimal moves — evaluation loss > 0.00 — evaluation gain < 0.00	23	21
brilliant moves !!	1	2
attractive moves !?	6	6
neutral moves — relevant gain/loss <> 0.00	23	21
neutral moves with engine evaluation = 0.00 or for lack of comparative variation ≧ 0.00	7	6
questionable moves ?!	9	10
moderate advantage — of White: ± — of Black: ∓	3	—
slight advantage — of White: ⩲ — of Black: ⩱	5	2
balanced position — engine evaluation <> 0.00 — =	20	15
balanced position or draw — engine evaluation = 0.00 — =	13	14
slight disadvantage — of White: ⩱ — of Black: ⩲	5	11
moderate disadvantage — of White: ∓ — of Black: ±	—	4
engine evaluation at last move — »evaluation real move«	0.00	0.00
win probability as per WDL at last move — »win probability WDL«	0.3%	0.3%
draw probability as per WDL at last move — »draw probability WDL«	99.4%	99.4%
loss probability as per WDL at last move — »loss probability WDL«	0.3%	0.3%
position evaluation symbol at last move — »position evaluation symbol«	=	=
probabilistic game result at last move in % — »probab. game result«	50%	50%
average optimum rate at last move in % — »optimum rate Ø«	97.11%	97.06%
cumulated absolute losses at last move — »losses ∑ absolute«	3.77	3.73
average absolute losses at last move — »losses Ø absolute«	0.08	0.08
cumulated relevant losses at last move — »losses ∑ relevant«	3.58	3.54
average relevant losses at last move — »losses Ø relevant«	0.08	0.08
moves with engine/calculation-WDL-ERR analysis	46	46

⇑ game 3 — statistics ⇑

⇓ game 4 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

game 4
player data
PGN tags / evaluation settings	player White	player Black
name	Deep Blue	Kasparov,G

⇑ game 4 — player data ⇑

⇓ game 4 — probabilistic game results ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

game 4
PGN tags / evaluation settings
PGN tags / evaluation settings	information
event/source/work	IBM Man-Machine
site	New York
date	1997.05.07
round/number/page	04
result	1/2-1/2
ECO	B12
annotator	Stockfish dev-20241031-24c57793
scheme move evaluation	7 sectors - 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/14 1/14 1/7 1/7 1/7
scheme position evaluation	9 sectors - 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/18 1/18 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9
scheme WDL evaluation relevance reduction	as per original engine WDLs or calculation
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.75	1.222 [182x]
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.875	1.797 [181x]
variations: general parameters	2 — for White/Black — from/until move no. 3 until end of game
variations: analysis stop parameter	depth 30 half-moves
FEN position before Variations start	rnbqkbnr/pp2pppp/2pp4/8/3PP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 3 d7d6

⇑ game 4 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇑

⇓ game 4 — engine evaluated moves ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

game 4
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

⇑ game 4 — probabilistic game results ⇑

⇓ game 4 — statistics ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

game 4
engine-evaluated moves
game no.	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = variation x	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = x.variation	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant
4																									2	2... d6	P	—	→ 3. c4	30	—	0.81	0.3%	64.1%	35.6%	± +/-	68%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	3	3. Nf3	M	>2	→ 3... d5	30	—	0.66	25.4%	74.0%	0.6%	± +/-	62%	0.81	0.63	‑0.15	‑0.10		95.86%	95.86%	0.15	0.15	0.10	0.10	3	3... Nf6	M	2	→ 4... g6	30	—	0.66	0.6%	73.8%	25.6%	± +/-	63%	0.66	0.66	0.00	0.00		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
4	4	4. Nc3	M	1	→ 4... g6	30	—	0.66	25.6%	73.8%	0.6%	± +/-	63%	0.66	0.64	0.02	0.02		100.00%	97.93%	0.15	0.08	0.10	0.05	4	4... Bg4 ?!	M	>2	→ 5... Bxf3	30	—	1.21	0.1%	34.2%	65.7%	++-	83%	0.66	0.91	‑0.55	‑0.30	?!	86.40%	93.20%	0.55	0.27	0.30	0.15
4	5	5. h3 !?	M	1	→ 5... Bxf3	30	—	1.21	65.7%	34.2%	0.1%	++-	83%	1.21	0.73	0.48	0.25	!?	100.00%	98.62%	0.15	0.05	0.10	0.03	5	5... Bh5	M	2	→ 6. g4	30	—	1.45	0.0%	19.5%	80.5%	++-	90%	1.21	1.45	‑0.24	‑0.06		96.71%	94.37%	0.79	0.26	0.36	0.12
4	6	6. Bd3 ?!	M	>2	→ 7. g4	30	—	1.01	50.6%	49.2%	0.2%	+-	75%	1.45	1.32	‑0.44	‑0.15	?!	92.50%	97.09%	0.59	0.15	0.25	0.06	6	6... e6	M	1	→ 7. g4	30	—	1.01	0.2%	49.2%	50.6%	+-	75%	1.01	1.20	0.19	0.08		100.00%	95.78%	0.79	0.20	0.36	0.09
4	7	7. Qe2 ?!	M	>2	→ 8. Bd2	30	—	0.55	19.7%	79.5%	0.8%	± +/-	59%	1.01	0.79	‑0.46	‑0.30	?!	87.22%	95.12%	1.05	0.21	0.55	0.11	7	7... d5	M	1	→ 8. Bd2	30	—	0.55	0.8%	79.5%	19.7%	± +/-	59%	0.55	0.59	0.04	0.03		100.00%	96.62%	0.79	0.16	0.36	0.07
4	8	8. Bg5 ?!	M	>2	→ 8... dxe4	30	—	0.28	9.5%	88.7%	1.8%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.55	0.39	‑0.27	‑0.23	?!	91.04%	94.44%	1.32	0.22	0.78	0.13	8	8... Be7	M	>2	→ 9. g4	30	—	0.27	1.8%	88.9%	9.3%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.28	0.32	0.01	0.01		100.00%	97.18%	0.79	0.13	0.36	0.06
4	9	9. e5 ?!	M	>2	→ 12. h4	30	—	0.01	2.5%	95.1%	2.4%	=	50%	0.27	0.22	‑0.26	‑0.25	?!	90.42%	93.86%	1.58	0.23	1.03	0.15	9	9... Nfd7	M	1	→ 12. h4	30	—	0.01	2.4%	95.1%	2.5%	=	50%	0.01	0.16	0.15	0.15		100.00%	97.59%	0.79	0.11	0.36	0.05
4	10	10. Bxe7 !?	M	1	→ 12. h4	30	—	0.01	2.5%	95.1%	2.4%	=	50%	0.01	‑0.29	0.30	0.29	!?	100.00%	94.63%	1.58	0.20	1.03	0.13	10	10... Qxe7 !?	M	1	→ 12. h4	30	—	0.01	2.4%	95.1%	2.5%	=	50%	0.01	0.47	0.46	0.43	!?	100.00%	97.89%	0.79	0.10	0.36	0.04
4	11	11. g4	M	1	→ 12. h4	30	—	0.01	2.5%	95.1%	2.4%	=	50%	0.01	‑0.13	0.14	0.14		100.00%	95.23%	1.58	0.18	1.03	0.11	11	11... Bg6 !!	M	1	→ 12. h4	30	—	0.01	2.4%	95.1%	2.5%	=	50%	0.01	4.16	4.15	1.20	!!	100.00%	98.12%	0.79	0.09	0.36	0.04
4	12	12. Bxg6	M	>2	→ 12... fxg6	30	—	‑0.09	1.3%	96.1%	2.6%	=	49%	0.01	‑0.03	‑0.10	‑0.10		95.91%	95.30%	1.68	0.17	1.13	0.11	12	12... hxg6 ?!	M	2	→ 13. Qe3	30	—	0.33	0.4%	94.2%	5.4%	⩲ +/=	53%	‑0.09	0.33	‑0.42	‑0.41	?!	84.16%	96.73%	1.21	0.12	0.77	0.08
4	13	13. h4 ?!	M	>2	→ 13... a6	30	—	‑0.09	1.0%	96.9%	2.1%	=	49%	0.33	0.00	‑0.42	‑0.41	?!	84.14%	94.28%	2.10	0.19	1.54	0.14	13	13... Na6 ?!	M	>2	→ 14. a3	30	100	0.34	0.3%	93.9%	5.8%	⩲ +/=	53%	‑0.09	0.36	‑0.43	‑0.42	?!	83.78%	95.55%	1.64	0.15	1.19	0.11
4	14	14. O‑O‑O	M	2	→ 15. Qd3	30	—	0.26	4.2%	95.3%	0.5%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.34	0.26	‑0.08	‑0.08		97.06%	94.51%	2.18	0.18	1.62	0.14	14	14... O‑O‑O	M	1	→ 15. Qd3	30	—	0.26	0.5%	95.3%	4.2%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.26	0.45	0.19	0.18		100.00%	95.92%	1.64	0.14	1.19	0.10
4	15	15. Rdg1	M	>2	→ 15... f6	30	—	0.10	2.1%	97.0%	0.9%	=	51%	0.26	0.26	‑0.16	‑0.16		93.90%	94.47%	2.34	0.18	1.78	0.14	15	15... Nc7 ?!	M	>2	→ 16. Qe3	30	—	0.39	0.3%	92.6%	7.1%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.10	0.29	‑0.29	‑0.28	?!	89.35%	95.42%	1.93	0.15	1.47	0.11
4	16	16. Kb1 ?!	M	>2	→ 17. a3	30	—	0.11	2.2%	96.9%	0.9%	=	51%	0.39	0.29	‑0.28	‑0.27	?!	89.73%	94.13%	2.62	0.19	2.05	0.15	16	16... f6	M	1	→ 17. a3	30	—	0.11	0.9%	96.9%	2.2%	=	51%	0.11	0.24	0.13	0.13		100.00%	95.74%	1.93	0.14	1.47	0.11
4	17	17. exf6	M	>2	→ 18. a3	30	—	0.00	1.2%	97.6%	1.2%	=	50%	0.11	0.06	‑0.11	‑0.11		95.56%	94.22%	2.73	0.18	2.16	0.14	17	17... Qxf6	M	1	→ 18. a3	30	—	0.00	1.2%	97.6%	1.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.09	0.09	0.09		100.00%	96.03%	1.93	0.13	1.47	0.10
4	18	18. Rg3	M	2	→ 18... Rhe8	30	—	0.00	1.2%	97.6%	1.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	94.58%	2.73	0.17	2.16	0.13	18	18... Rde8	M	2	→ 19... Re7	30	—	‑0.03	1.3%	97.6%	1.1%	=	50%	‑0.03	0.00	0.03	0.03		100.00%	96.27%	1.93	0.12	1.47	0.09
4	19	19. Re1 !?	M	1	→ 19... Re7	30	—	‑0.03	1.1%	97.6%	1.3%	=	50%	‑0.03	‑0.36	0.33	0.32	!?	100.00%	94.90%	2.73	0.16	2.16	0.13	19	19... Rhf8	M	2	→ 20. a3	30	—	0.09	0.8%	97.4%	1.8%	=	51%	‑0.03	0.09	‑0.12	‑0.12		95.39%	96.22%	2.05	0.12	1.59	0.09
4	20	20. Nd1	M	2	→ 22... Nc5	30	—	0.00	1.1%	97.8%	1.1%	=	50%	0.09	0.00	‑0.09	‑0.09		96.55%	94.99%	2.82	0.16	2.25	0.12	20	20... e5	M	1	→ 22... Nc5	30	—	0.00	1.1%	97.8%	1.1%	=	50%	0.00	0.03	0.03	0.03		100.00%	96.43%	2.05	0.11	1.59	0.09
4	21	21. dxe5 !?	M	1	→ 22... Nc5	30	—	0.00	1.1%	97.8%	1.1%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.63	0.63	0.58	!?	100.00%	95.26%	2.82	0.15	2.25	0.12	21	21... Qf4	M	1	→ 22... Nc5	30	—	0.00	1.1%	97.8%	1.1%	=	50%	0.00	0.15	0.15	0.15		100.00%	96.62%	2.05	0.11	1.59	0.08
4	22	22. a3	M	1	→ 22... Nc5	30	—	0.00	1.1%	97.8%	1.1%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	95.49%	2.82	0.14	2.25	0.11	22	22... Ne6	M	2	→ 23... Kb8	30	—	0.00	1.1%	97.8%	1.1%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.79%	2.05	0.10	1.59	0.08
4	23	23. Nc3	M	1	→ 23... Kb8	30	—	0.00	1.1%	97.8%	1.1%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.08	0.08	0.08		100.00%	95.71%	2.82	0.13	2.25	0.11	23	23... Ndc5	M	>2	→ 25... a5	30	48	0.08	0.8%	97.7%	1.5%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	‑0.08	‑0.08		96.90%	96.79%	2.13	0.10	1.67	0.08
4	24	24. b4	M	1	→ 25... a5	30	48	0.08	1.5%	97.7%	0.8%	=	50%	0.14	0.08	‑0.06	‑0.06		97.73%	95.80%	2.88	0.13	2.31	0.10	24	24... Nd7	M	1	→ 25... a5	30	48	0.08	0.8%	97.7%	1.5%	=	50%	0.08	0.22	0.14	0.14		100.00%	96.94%	2.13	0.10	1.67	0.08
4	25	25. Qd3	M	1	→ 25... a5	30	48	0.08	1.5%	97.7%	0.8%	=	50%	0.08	0.00	0.08	0.08		100.00%	95.98%	2.88	0.13	2.31	0.10	25	25... Qf7	M	2	→ 26. Na4	30	88	0.16	0.5%	97.3%	2.2%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.08	0.16	‑0.08	‑0.08		96.99%	96.94%	2.21	0.10	1.75	0.08
4	26	26. b5 ?!	M	>2	→ 27... Kb8	30	8	‑0.27	0.3%	96.2%	3.5%	⩱ =/+	48%	0.16	0.02	‑0.43	‑0.42	?!	84.26%	95.50%	3.31	0.14	2.73	0.11	26	26... Ndc5	M	1	→ 27... Kb8	30	8	‑0.27	3.5%	96.2%	0.3%	⩱ =/+	48%	‑0.27	‑0.23	0.04	0.04		100.00%	97.07%	2.21	0.09	1.75	0.07
4	27	27. Qe3 !?	M	1	→ 27... Kb8	30	8	‑0.27	0.3%	96.2%	3.5%	⩱ =/+	48%	‑0.27	‑0.52	0.25	0.23	!?	100.00%	95.68%	3.31	0.13	2.73	0.11	27	27... Qf4	M	>2	→ 28. h5	30	16	‑0.16	2.2%	97.3%	0.5%	⩱ =/+	49%	‑0.27	‑0.17	‑0.11	‑0.11		96.02%	97.03%	2.32	0.09	1.86	0.07
4	28	28. bxc6 ?!	M	>2	→ 29. Ka1	30	46	‑0.40	0.1%	94.2%	5.7%	⩱ =/+	47%	‑0.16	‑0.17	‑0.24	‑0.23	?!	91.53%	95.52%	3.55	0.14	2.96	0.11	28	28... bxc6 !	M	1	→ 29. Ka1	30	46	‑0.40	5.7%	94.2%	0.1%	⩱ =/+	47%	‑0.40	0.55	0.95	0.92	!	100.00%	97.14%	2.32	0.09	1.86	0.07
4	29	29. Rd1	M	>2	→ 29... Re7	30	215	‑0.29	0.2%	96.4%	3.4%	⩱ =/+	48%	‑0.40	‑0.53	0.11	0.11		100.00%	95.68%	3.55	0.13	2.96	0.11	29	29... Kc7	M	2	→ 30. h5	30	48	‑0.13	1.7%	97.8%	0.5%	=	49%	‑0.29	‑0.13	‑0.16	‑0.16		94.15%	97.03%	2.48	0.09	2.02	0.07
4	30	30. Ka1 ?	M	>2	→ 30... Re7	30	118	‑0.85	0.0%	67.1%	32.9%	-+	34%	‑0.13	‑0.62	‑0.72	‑0.60	?	76.45%	95.00%	4.27	0.15	3.56	0.13	30	30... Qxe3 ?	M	>2	→ 31... Nd8	30	54	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	‑0.85	‑0.42	‑0.85	‑0.71	?	71.64%	96.12%	3.33	0.12	2.73	0.10
4	31	31. fxe3 !!	M	1	→ 31... Nd8	30	54	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	‑5.12	5.12	1.17	!!	100.00%	95.17%	4.27	0.15	3.56	0.12	31	31... Rf7	M	>2	→ 32. h5	30	721	‑0.01	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.01	0.01		100.00%	96.26%	3.33	0.11	2.73	0.09
4	32	32. Rh3	M	>2	→ 32... Rh8	30	7	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	‑0.01	‑0.07	0.01	0.01		100.00%	95.33%	4.27	0.14	3.56	0.12	32	32... Ref8	M	2	→ 34. Nce2	30	58	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.38%	3.33	0.11	2.73	0.09
4	33	33. Nd4 !	M	1	→ 34. Nce2	30	58	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.83	0.83	0.72	!	100.00%	95.48%	4.27	0.14	3.56	0.11	33	33... Rf2	M	1	→ 34. Nce2	30	58	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.50%	3.33	0.11	2.73	0.09
4	34	34. Rb1	M	>2	→ 35. h5	30	251	‑0.09	0.2%	99.3%	0.5%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.17	‑0.09	‑0.09		96.24%	95.50%	4.36	0.14	3.65	0.11	34	34... Rg2	M	1	→ 35. h5	30	251	‑0.09	0.5%	99.3%	0.2%	=	50%	‑0.09	‑0.06	0.03	0.03		100.00%	96.61%	3.33	0.10	2.73	0.09
4	35	35. Nce2	M	2	→ 35... Rff2	30	284	‑0.16	0.1%	99.1%	0.8%	⩱ =/+	50%	‑0.09	‑0.16	‑0.07	‑0.07		97.16%	95.55%	4.43	0.13	3.72	0.11	35	35... Rxg4	M	2	→ 37... Re8	30	404	‑0.04	0.4%	99.4%	0.2%	=	50%	‑0.16	‑0.04	‑0.12	‑0.12		95.13%	96.56%	3.45	0.10	2.85	0.09
4	36	36. Nxe6+ !?	M	1	→ 37... Re8	30	404	‑0.04	0.2%	99.4%	0.4%	=	50%	‑0.04	‑0.25	0.21	0.21	!?	100.00%	95.68%	4.43	0.13	3.72	0.11	36	36... Nxe6 !!	M	1	→ 37... Re8	30	404	‑0.04	0.4%	99.4%	0.2%	=	50%	‑0.04	7.20	7.24	1.21	!!	100.00%	96.67%	3.45	0.10	2.85	0.08
4	37	37. Nd4	M	1	→ 37... Re8	30	404	‑0.04	0.2%	99.4%	0.4%	=	50%	‑0.04	‑0.05	0.01	0.01		100.00%	95.81%	4.43	0.13	3.72	0.11	37	37... Nxd4	M	2	→ 38... Rf2	30	1031	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	‑0.04	0.00	‑0.04	‑0.04		98.30%	96.71%	3.49	0.10	2.89	0.08
4	38	38. exd4 !!	M	1	→ 38... Rf2	30	1031	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	‑5.15	5.15	1.16	!!	100.00%	95.92%	4.43	0.12	3.72	0.10	38	38... Rxd4	M	2	→ 39. Rhb3	30	1113	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.80%	3.49	0.10	2.89	0.08
4	39	39. Rg1	M	2	→ 39... Rff4	30	995	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.03%	4.43	0.12	3.72	0.10	39	39... Rc4	M	2	→ 40. Kb2	30	1257	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.89%	3.49	0.09	2.89	0.08
4	40	40. Rxg6	M	>2	→ 42. Rg1	30	1696	0.00	0.3%	99.5%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.07	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.14%	4.43	0.12	3.72	0.10	40	40... Rxc2	M	1	→ 42. Rg1	30	1696	0.00	0.3%	99.5%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.97%	3.49	0.09	2.89	0.08
4	41	41. Rxg7+	M	1	→ 42. Rg1	30	1696	0.00	0.3%	99.5%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.14	0.14	0.14		100.00%	96.24%	4.43	0.11	3.72	0.10	41	41... Kb6	M	1	→ 42. Rg1	30	1696	0.00	0.3%	99.5%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.05%	3.49	0.09	2.89	0.07
4	42	42. Rb3+	M	>2	→ 43. Rg1	30	10885	0.00	0.3%	99.5%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	‑0.14	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.33%	4.43	0.11	3.72	0.09	42	42... Kc5	M	1	→ 43. Rg1	30	10885	0.00	0.3%	99.5%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.12%	3.49	0.09	2.89	0.07
4	43	43. Rxa7 ?!	M	>2	→ 43... d4	30	19250	‑0.52	0.0%	94.6%	5.4%	∓ -/+	47%	0.00	‑0.48	‑0.52	‑0.51	?!	81.33%	95.97%	4.95	0.12	4.23	0.10	43	43... Rf1+ ?!	M	>2	→ 45... Rf1+	30	1055	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	‑0.52	‑0.17	‑0.52	‑0.51	?!	81.33%	96.74%	4.01	0.10	3.40	0.08
4	44	44. Rb1	S	1	→ 45... Rf1+	30	1055	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	—	≧ 0.00	≧ 0.00		100.00%	96.06%	4.95	0.12	4.23	0.10	44	44... Rff2	M	1	→ 45... Rf1+	30	1055	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.82%	4.01	0.10	3.40	0.08
4	45	45. Rb4 !!	M	1	→ 45... Rf1+	30	1055	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	‑2.02	2.02	1.01	!!	100.00%	96.15%	4.95	0.12	4.23	0.10	45	45... Rc1+	M	2	→ 48... Rcc2	30	735	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.89%	4.01	0.09	3.40	0.08
4	46	46. Rb1	S	1	→ 48... Rcc2	30	735	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	—	≧ 0.00	≧ 0.00		100.00%	96.24%	4.95	0.11	4.23	0.10	46	46... Rcc2	M	1	→ 48... Rcc2	30	735	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.96%	4.01	0.09	3.40	0.08
4	47	47. Rb4 !!	M	1	→ 48... Rcc2	30	735	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	‑2.21	2.21	1.11	!!	100.00%	96.32%	4.95	0.11	4.23	0.09	47	47... Rc1+	M	1	→ 48... Rcc2	30	735	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.03%	4.01	0.09	3.40	0.08
4	48	48. Rb1	S	1	→ 48... Rcc2	30	735	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	—	≧ 0.00	≧ 0.00		100.00%	96.40%	4.95	0.11	4.23	0.09	48	48... Rxb1+	M	>2	→ 50. h5	30	6241	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.09%	4.01	0.09	3.40	0.07
4	49	49. Kxb1	S	1	→ 50. h5	30	6241	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	—	≧ 0.00	≧ 0.00		100.00%	96.48%	4.95	0.11	4.23	0.09	49	49... Re2	M	1	→ 50. h5	30	6241	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.15%	4.01	0.09	3.40	0.07
4	50	50. Re7	M	2	→ 50... d4	30	31738	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.55%	4.95	0.10	4.23	0.09	50	50... Rh2	M	2	→ 51. Rd7	30	4712	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.21%	4.01	0.08	3.40	0.07
4	51	51. Rh7	M	2	→ 51... d4	30	2834	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.62%	4.95	0.10	4.23	0.09	51	51... Kc4	M	>2	→ 52... Kc5	30	3119	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.27%	4.01	0.08	3.40	0.07
4	52	52. Rc7	M	1	→ 52... Kc5	30	3119	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.69%	4.95	0.10	4.23	0.08	52	52... c5	M	2	→ 55... Kb4	30	717	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.32%	4.01	0.08	3.40	0.07
4	53	53. e6	M	1	→ 55... Kb4	30	717	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.76%	4.95	0.10	4.23	0.08	53	53... Rxh4	M	1	→ 55... Kb4	30	717	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.38%	4.01	0.08	3.40	0.07
4	54	54. e7	M	1	→ 55... Kb4	30	717	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.82%	4.95	0.10	4.23	0.08	54	54... Re4	M	1	→ 55... Kb4	30	717	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.43%	4.01	0.08	3.40	0.07
4	55	55. a4	M	1	→ 55... Kb4	30	717	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.88%	4.95	0.09	4.23	0.08	55	55... Kb3	M	2	→ 56. Rxc5	30	617	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.48%	4.01	0.08	3.40	0.06
4	56	56. Kc1	M	2	↓	30	617	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.94%	4.95	0.09	4.23	0.08

⇑ game 4 — engine evaluated moves ⇑

⇓ game 5 — player data ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

game 4
statistics
type	player White	player Black
moves with own (↓) or from following move derived (→) precise engine evaluation	54	54
moves without precise engine evaluation	—	—
phantom moves without own, but from the following move derived (→) engine evaluation	—	1
optimal moves — evaluation gain ≧ 0.00	35	39
suboptimal moves — evaluation loss > 0.00 — evaluation gain < 0.00	19	14
brilliant moves !!	4	2
impressive moves !	1	1
attractive moves !?	6	1
neutral moves — relevant gain/loss <> 0.00	17	22
neutral moves with engine evaluation = 0.00 or for lack of comparative variation ≧ 0.00	16	21
questionable moves ?!	9	5
unsuitable moves ?	1	1
extreme advantage — of White: ++- — of Black: --+	1	—
clear advantage — of White: +- — of Black: -+	1	—
moderate advantage — of White: ± — of Black: ∓	3	—
slight advantage — of White: ⩲ — of Black: ⩱	2	3
balanced position — engine evaluation <> 0.00 — =	13	13
balanced position or draw — engine evaluation = 0.00 — =	27	26
slight disadvantage — of White: ⩱ — of Black: ⩲	5	6
moderate disadvantage — of White: ∓ — of Black: ±	1	3
clear disadvantage — of White: -+ — of Black: +-	1	1
extreme disadvantage — of White: --+ — of Black: ++-	—	2
engine evaluation at last move — »evaluation real move«	0.00	0.00
win probability as per WDL at last move — »win probability WDL«	0.2%	0.2%
draw probability as per WDL at last move — »draw probability WDL«	99.6%	99.6%
loss probability as per WDL at last move — »loss probability WDL«	0.2%	0.2%
position evaluation symbol at last move — »position evaluation symbol«	=	=
probabilistic game result at last move in % — »probab. game result«	50%	50%
average optimum rate at last move in % — »optimum rate Ø«	96.94%	97.48%
cumulated absolute losses at last move — »losses ∑ absolute«	4.95	4.01
average absolute losses at last move — »losses Ø absolute«	0.09	0.08
cumulated relevant losses at last move — »losses ∑ relevant«	4.23	3.40
average relevant losses at last move — »losses Ø relevant«	0.08	0.06
moves with engine/calculation-WDL-ERR analysis	54	54

⇑ game 4 — statistics ⇑

⇓ game 5 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 5
player data
PGN tags / evaluation settings	player White	player Black
name	Kasparov,G	Deep Blue

⇑ game 5 — player data ⇑

⇓ game 5 — probabilistic game results ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 5
PGN tags / evaluation settings
PGN tags / evaluation settings	information
event/source/work	IBM Man-Machine
site	New York
date	1997.05.09
round/number/page	05
result	1/2-1/2
ECO	A07
annotator	Stockfish dev-20241031-24c57793
scheme move evaluation	7 sectors - 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/14 1/14 1/7 1/7 1/7
scheme position evaluation	9 sectors - 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/18 1/18 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9
scheme WDL evaluation relevance reduction	as per original engine WDLs or calculation
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.75	1.218 [170x]
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.875	1.778 [170x]
variations: general parameters	2 — for White/Black — from/until move no. 3 until end of game
variations: analysis stop parameter	depth 30 half-moves
FEN position before Variations start	rn1qkbnr/ppp1pppp/8/3p4/6b1/5NP1/PPPPPP1P/RNBQKB1R w KQkq - 1 3 c8g4

⇑ game 5 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇑

⇓ game 5 — engine evaluated moves ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 5
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

⇑ game 5 — probabilistic game results ⇑

⇓ game 5 — statistics ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 5
engine-evaluated moves
game no.	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = variation x	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = x.variation	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant
5																									2	2... Bg4	P	—	→ 4. c4	30	—	0.23	2.1%	89.6%	8.3%	⩲ +/=	53%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5	3	3. Bg2	M	1	↓	30	—	0.23	8.3%	89.6%	2.1%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.23	0.16	0.07	0.07		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	3	3... Nd7	M	1	→ 3. Bg2	31	—	0.23	2.1%	89.6%	8.3%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.23	0.24	0.01	0.01		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
5	4	4. h3	M	2	→ 6... a5	30	—	0.23	5.5%	93.4%	1.1%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.29	0.23	‑0.06	‑0.06		97.92%	98.96%	0.06	0.03	0.06	0.03	4	4... Bxf3	M	1	→ 6... a5	30	—	0.23	1.1%	93.4%	5.5%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.23	0.30	0.07	0.07		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
5	5	5. Bxf3 !?	M	1	→ 6... a5	30	—	0.23	5.5%	93.4%	1.1%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.23	0.00	0.23	0.22	!?	100.00%	99.31%	0.06	0.02	0.06	0.02	5	5... c6	M	1	→ 6... a5	30	—	0.23	1.1%	93.4%	5.5%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.23	0.32	0.09	0.09		100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
5	6	6. d3	M	1	→ 6... a5	30	—	0.23	5.5%	93.4%	1.1%	⩲ +/=	52%	0.23	0.20	0.03	0.03		100.00%	99.48%	0.06	0.01	0.06	0.01	6	6... e6	M	>2	→ 7. O-O	30	—	0.31	0.8%	92.0%	7.2%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.23	0.29	‑0.08	‑0.08		97.23%	99.31%	0.08	0.02	0.08	0.02
5	7	7. e4	M	>2	→ 7... Ngf6	30	—	0.29	6.7%	92.4%	0.9%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.31	0.29	‑0.02	‑0.02		99.31%	99.45%	0.08	0.02	0.08	0.02	7	7... Ne5	M	>2	→ 10... Qc7	30	—	0.32	0.6%	92.7%	6.7%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.29	0.32	‑0.03	‑0.03		98.91%	99.23%	0.11	0.02	0.11	0.02
5	8	8. Bg2	M	1	→ 10... Qc7	30	—	0.32	6.7%	92.7%	0.6%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.36	0.32	‑0.04	‑0.04		98.59%	99.30%	0.12	0.02	0.12	0.02	8	8... dxe4 !?	M	1	→ 10... Qc7	30	—	0.32	0.6%	92.7%	6.7%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.32	0.69	0.37	0.31	!?	100.00%	99.36%	0.11	0.02	0.11	0.02
5	9	9. Bxe4	M	1	→ 10... Qc7	30	—	0.32	6.7%	92.7%	0.6%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.34	0.32	‑0.02	‑0.02		99.28%	99.30%	0.14	0.02	0.14	0.02	9	9... Nf6	M	1	→ 10... Qc7	30	—	0.32	0.6%	92.7%	6.7%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.32	0.36	0.04	0.04		100.00%	99.45%	0.11	0.02	0.11	0.02
5	10	10. Bg2 !?	M	1	→ 10... Qc7	30	—	0.32	6.7%	92.7%	0.6%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.32	0.11	0.21	0.20	!?	100.00%	99.39%	0.14	0.02	0.14	0.02	10	10... Bb4+ ?!	M	>2	→ 11... O-O	30	—	0.57	0.2%	84.1%	15.7%	± +/-	58%	0.32	0.41	‑0.25	‑0.22	?!	91.81%	98.49%	0.36	0.04	0.33	0.04
5	11	11. Nd2	M	1	→ 11... O-O	30	—	0.57	15.7%	84.1%	0.2%	± +/-	58%	0.57	0.40	0.17	0.15		100.00%	99.46%	0.14	0.02	0.14	0.02	11	11... h5 ?!	M	>2	→ 15... Rd8	30	—	0.85	0.1%	63.6%	36.3%	+-	68%	0.57	0.57	‑0.28	‑0.21	?!	91.61%	97.73%	0.64	0.07	0.54	0.06
5	12	12. Qe2 !?	M	1	→ 15... Rd8	30	—	0.85	36.3%	63.6%	0.1%	+-	68%	0.85	0.45	0.40	0.31	!?	100.00%	99.51%	0.14	0.01	0.14	0.01	12	12... Qc7	M	1	→ 15... Rd8	30	—	0.85	0.1%	63.6%	36.3%	+-	68%	0.85	0.94	0.09	0.05		100.00%	97.96%	0.64	0.06	0.54	0.05
5	13	13. c3	M	1	→ 15... Rd8	30	—	0.85	36.3%	63.6%	0.1%	+-	68%	0.85	0.67	0.18	0.13		100.00%	99.55%	0.14	0.01	0.14	0.01	13	13... Be7	M	1	→ 15... Rd8	30	—	0.85	0.1%	63.6%	36.3%	+-	68%	0.85	1.08	0.23	0.12		100.00%	98.14%	0.64	0.06	0.54	0.05
5	14	14. d4	M	1	→ 15... Rd8	30	—	0.85	36.3%	63.6%	0.1%	+-	68%	0.85	0.63	0.22	0.16		100.00%	99.59%	0.14	0.01	0.14	0.01	14	14... Ng6	M	1	→ 15... Rd8	30	—	0.85	0.1%	63.6%	36.3%	+-	68%	0.85	0.93	0.08	0.05		100.00%	98.30%	0.64	0.05	0.54	0.05
5	15	15. h4 !?	M	1	→ 15... Rd8	30	—	0.85	36.3%	63.6%	0.1%	+-	68%	0.85	0.21	0.64	0.51	!?	100.00%	99.62%	0.14	0.01	0.14	0.01	15	15... e5	M	>2	→ 16. Ne4	30	—	0.70	0.1%	76.2%	23.7%	± +/-	62%	0.85	0.89	0.15	0.11		100.00%	98.43%	0.64	0.05	0.54	0.04
5	16	16. Nf3 ?!	M	2	→ 17. cxd4	30	—	0.30	5.9%	93.5%	0.6%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.70	0.30	‑0.40	‑0.34	?!	86.78%	98.71%	0.54	0.04	0.48	0.03	16	16... exd4 !?	M	1	→ 17. cxd4	30	—	0.30	0.6%	93.5%	5.9%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.30	0.80	0.50	0.41	!?	100.00%	98.54%	0.64	0.05	0.54	0.04
5	17	17. Nxd4	M	2	→ 17... O-O	30	—	0.16	3.2%	95.9%	0.9%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.30	0.16	‑0.14	‑0.13		94.76%	98.44%	0.68	0.05	0.61	0.04	17	17... O‑O‑O ??	M	>2	→ 18. O-O	30	29	1.78	0.0%	4.0%	96.0%	++-	98%	0.16	0.37	‑1.62	‑0.82	??	58.65%	95.88%	2.26	0.15	1.36	0.09
5	18	18. Bg5 ?	M	>2	→ 18... Nd5	30	—	0.53	12.7%	87.1%	0.2%	± +/-	56%	1.78	0.80	‑1.25	‑0.57	?	73.59%	96.89%	1.93	0.12	1.18	0.07	18	18... Ng4 ?!	M	2	→ 19. Be4	30	9	0.84	0.1%	65.5%	34.4%	+-	67%	0.53	0.84	‑0.31	‑0.24	?!	90.47%	95.54%	2.57	0.16	1.60	0.10
5	19	19. O‑O‑O ?!	M	2	→ 19... Bxg5+	30	—	0.49	11.3%	88.5%	0.2%	± +/-	56%	0.84	0.49	‑0.35	‑0.27	?!	89.14%	96.43%	2.28	0.13	1.45	0.09	19	19... Rhe8 ?!	M	>2	→ 20. Be4	30	—	0.96	0.0%	53.9%	46.1%	+-	73%	0.49	1.00	‑0.47	‑0.34	?!	86.13%	94.99%	3.04	0.18	1.94	0.11
5	20	20. Qc2 ?!	M	2	→ 20... Bxg5+	30	1	0.32	5.9%	93.6%	0.5%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.96	0.32	‑0.64	‑0.48	?!	80.16%	95.53%	2.92	0.16	1.93	0.11	20	20... Kb8	M	2	→ 21. Rhe1	30	4	0.32	0.5%	93.7%	5.8%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.32	0.32	0.00	0.00		100.00%	95.27%	3.04	0.17	1.94	0.11
5	21	21. Kb1	M	>2	→ 24. Nf5	30	—	0.38	5.4%	94.4%	0.2%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.32	0.30	0.06	0.06		100.00%	95.76%	2.92	0.15	1.93	0.10	21	21... Bxg5 !?	M	1	→ 24. Nf5	30	—	0.38	0.2%	94.4%	5.4%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.38	0.78	0.40	0.33	!?	100.00%	95.52%	3.04	0.16	1.94	0.10
5	22	22. hxg5 !!	M	1	→ 24. Nf5	30	—	0.38	5.4%	94.4%	0.2%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.38	‑2.87	3.25	1.70	!!	100.00%	95.98%	2.92	0.15	1.93	0.10	22	22... N6e5	M	1	→ 24. Nf5	30	—	0.38	0.2%	94.4%	5.4%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.38	0.40	0.02	0.02		100.00%	95.74%	3.04	0.15	1.94	0.10
5	23	23. Rhe1	M	1	→ 24. Nf5	30	—	0.38	5.4%	94.4%	0.2%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.38	0.19	0.19	0.18		100.00%	96.17%	2.92	0.14	1.93	0.09	23	23... c5	M	1	→ 24. Nf5	30	—	0.38	0.2%	94.4%	5.4%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.37	0.38	‑0.01	‑0.01		99.65%	95.93%	3.05	0.15	1.95	0.09
5	24	24. Nf3 ?!	M	>2	→ 25... a6	30	40	0.14	1.0%	98.8%	0.2%	=	50%	0.38	0.27	‑0.24	‑0.23	?!	91.50%	95.96%	3.16	0.14	2.16	0.10	24	24... Rxd1+	M	1	→ 25... a6	30	40	0.14	0.2%	98.8%	1.0%	=	50%	0.14	0.27	0.13	0.13		100.00%	96.11%	3.05	0.14	1.95	0.09
5	25	25. Rxd1 !?	M	1	→ 25... a6	30	40	0.14	1.0%	98.8%	0.2%	=	50%	0.14	‑0.21	0.35	0.35	!?	100.00%	96.13%	3.16	0.14	2.16	0.09	25	25... Nc4	M	2	→ 29. b3	30	42	0.09	0.3%	98.9%	0.8%	=	50%	0.09	0.14	0.05	0.05		100.00%	96.28%	3.05	0.13	1.95	0.08
5	26	26. Qa4	M	1	→ 29. b3	30	42	0.09	0.8%	98.9%	0.3%	=	50%	0.09	0.00	0.09	0.09		100.00%	96.29%	3.16	0.13	2.16	0.09	26	26... Rd8 !!	M	1	→ 29. b3	30	42	0.09	0.3%	98.9%	0.8%	=	50%	0.09	2.79	2.70	1.12	!!	100.00%	96.44%	3.05	0.13	1.95	0.08
5	27	27. Re1	M	1	→ 29. b3	30	42	0.09	0.8%	98.9%	0.3%	=	50%	0.09	0.00	0.09	0.09		100.00%	96.44%	3.16	0.13	2.16	0.09	27	27... Nb6 !?	M	1	→ 29. b3	30	42	0.09	0.3%	98.9%	0.8%	=	50%	0.09	0.31	0.22	0.22	!?	100.00%	96.58%	3.05	0.12	1.95	0.08
5	28	28. Qc2 !!	M	1	→ 29. b3	30	42	0.09	0.8%	98.9%	0.3%	=	50%	0.09	‑1.04	1.13	0.86	!!	100.00%	96.58%	3.16	0.12	2.16	0.08	28	28... Qd6	M	1	→ 29. b3	30	42	0.09	0.3%	98.9%	0.8%	=	50%	0.09	0.13	0.04	0.04		100.00%	96.71%	3.05	0.12	1.95	0.07
5	29	29. c4	M	>2	→ 29... Rd7	30	—	0.00	0.5%	99.0%	0.5%	=	50%	0.09	0.07	‑0.09	‑0.09		96.29%	96.57%	3.25	0.12	2.25	0.08	29	29... Qg6 ?!	M	>2	→ 32. Ne5	30	101	0.49	0.0%	95.4%	4.6%	± +/-	52%	0.00	0.00	‑0.49	‑0.48	?!	82.26%	96.17%	3.54	0.13	2.43	0.09
5	30	30. Qxg6 !?	M	1	→ 32. Ne5	30	101	0.49	4.6%	95.4%	0.0%	± +/-	52%	0.49	0.00	0.49	0.48	!?	100.00%	96.69%	3.25	0.12	2.25	0.08	30	30... fxg6 !	M	1	→ 32. Ne5	30	101	0.49	0.0%	95.4%	4.6%	± +/-	52%	0.49	6.53	6.04	0.87	!	100.00%	96.31%	3.54	0.13	2.43	0.09
5	31	31. b3 !?	M	1	→ 32. Ne5	30	101	0.49	4.6%	95.4%	0.0%	± +/-	52%	0.49	0.25	0.24	0.23	!?	100.00%	96.80%	3.25	0.11	2.25	0.08	31	31... Nxf2 !?	M	1	→ 32. Ne5	30	101	0.49	0.0%	95.4%	4.6%	± +/-	52%	0.49	0.94	0.45	0.35	!?	100.00%	96.44%	3.54	0.12	2.43	0.08
5	32	32. Re6 ?!	M	>2	→ 33. Ne5	30	836	0.14	0.6%	99.3%	0.1%	=	50%	0.49	0.29	‑0.35	‑0.34	?!	87.38%	96.49%	3.60	0.12	2.59	0.09	32	32... Kc7	M	1	→ 33. Ne5	30	836	0.14	0.1%	99.3%	0.6%	⩲ +/=	50%	0.14	0.21	0.07	0.07		100.00%	96.56%	3.54	0.12	2.43	0.08
5	33	33. Rxg6	M	>2	→ 35. Bf3	30	1386	0.06	0.4%	99.4%	0.2%	=	50%	0.14	0.11	‑0.08	‑0.08		96.74%	96.50%	3.68	0.12	2.67	0.09	33	33... Rd7 !?	M	1	→ 35. Bf3	30	1386	0.06	0.2%	99.4%	0.4%	=	50%	0.06	0.29	0.23	0.23	!?	100.00%	96.67%	3.54	0.11	2.43	0.08
5	34	34. Nh4	M	1	→ 35. Bf3	30	1386	0.06	0.4%	99.4%	0.2%	=	50%	0.06	0.04	0.02	0.02		100.00%	96.61%	3.68	0.12	2.67	0.08	34	34... Nc8 !	M	1	→ 35. Bf3	30	1386	0.06	0.2%	99.4%	0.4%	=	50%	0.06	0.68	0.62	0.58	!	100.00%	96.77%	3.54	0.11	2.43	0.08
5	35	35. Bd5	M	>2	→ 35... Ne7	30	1942	0.00	0.3%	99.4%	0.3%	=	50%	0.06	0.04	‑0.06	‑0.06		97.47%	96.63%	3.74	0.11	2.73	0.08	35	35... Nd6 ?!	M	>2	→ 40. Kc1	30	2371	0.25	0.1%	98.8%	1.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.00	0.14	‑0.25	‑0.25	?!	90.22%	96.57%	3.79	0.11	2.68	0.08
5	36	36. Re6 !?	M	1	→ 40. Kc1	30	2371	0.25	1.1%	98.8%	0.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.25	0.00	0.25	0.25	!?	100.00%	96.73%	3.74	0.11	2.73	0.08	36	36... Nb5	M	1	→ 40. Kc1	30	2371	0.25	0.1%	98.8%	1.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.25	0.44	0.19	0.19		100.00%	96.67%	3.79	0.11	2.68	0.08
5	37	37. cxb5 !?	M	1	→ 40. Kc1	30	2371	0.25	1.1%	98.8%	0.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.25	0.00	0.25	0.25	!?	100.00%	96.83%	3.74	0.11	2.73	0.08	37	37... Rxd5 !!	M	1	→ 40. Kc1	30	2371	0.25	0.1%	98.8%	1.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.25	4.76	4.51	1.02	!!	100.00%	96.77%	3.79	0.11	2.68	0.08
5	38	38. Rg6 !?	M	1	→ 40. Kc1	30	2371	0.25	1.1%	98.8%	0.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.25	0.00	0.25	0.25	!?	100.00%	96.91%	3.74	0.10	2.73	0.08	38	38... Rd7	M	1	→ 40. Kc1	30	2371	0.25	0.1%	98.8%	1.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.07	0.25	‑0.18	‑0.18		92.97%	96.66%	3.97	0.11	2.86	0.08
5	39	39. Nf5 !?	M	1	→ 40. Kc1	30	2371	0.25	1.1%	98.8%	0.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.25	0.00	0.25	0.25	!?	100.00%	97.00%	3.74	0.10	2.73	0.07	39	39... Ne4 !	M	1	→ 40. Kc1	30	2371	0.25	0.1%	98.8%	1.1%	⩲ +/=	51%	0.25	1.47	1.22	0.64	!	100.00%	96.75%	3.97	0.11	2.86	0.08
5	40	40. Nxg7 ?!	M	>2	→ 43... Rg2	30	10847	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.25	0.14	‑0.25	‑0.25	?!	90.22%	96.82%	3.99	0.11	2.98	0.08	40	40... Rd1+	M	1	→ 43... Rg2	30	10847	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.12	0.12	0.12		100.00%	96.84%	3.97	0.10	2.86	0.08
5	41	41. Kc2	M	1	→ 43... Rg2	30	10847	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.05	0.00	‑0.05	‑0.05		97.89%	96.85%	4.04	0.10	3.03	0.08	41	41... Rd2+ !	M	1	→ 43... Rg2	30	10847	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.98	0.98	0.75	!	100.00%	96.92%	3.97	0.10	2.86	0.07
5	42	42. Kc1	M	1	→ 43... Rg2	30	10847	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.93%	4.04	0.10	3.03	0.08	42	42... Rxa2 !?	M	1	→ 43... Rg2	30	10847	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.38	0.38	0.38	!?	100.00%	97.00%	3.97	0.10	2.86	0.07
5	43	43. Nxh5	M	1	→ 43... Rg2	30	10847	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	97.00%	4.04	0.10	3.03	0.07	43	43... Nd2 ??	M	>2	→ 44. Rg7+	30	62348	2.32	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	0.00	0.19	‑2.32	‑1.15	??	50.00%	95.85%	6.29	0.15	4.01	0.10
5	44	44. Nf4 ??	M	>2	→ 46. Rg7+	30	51929	0.02	0.3%	99.5%	0.2%	=	50%	2.32	0.33	‑2.30	‑1.14	??	50.86%	95.90%	6.34	0.15	4.17	0.10	44	44... Nxb3+ !!	M	1	→ 46. Rg7+	30	51929	0.02	0.2%	99.5%	0.3%	=	50%	0.02	3.16	3.14	1.15	!!	100.00%	95.95%	6.29	0.15	4.01	0.10
5	45	45. Kb1	M	1	→ 46. Rg7+	30	51929	0.02	0.3%	99.5%	0.2%	=	50%	0.02	0.02	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.00%	6.34	0.15	4.17	0.10	45	45... Rd2 !!	M	1	→ 46. Rg7+	30	51929	0.02	0.2%	99.5%	0.3%	=	50%	0.02	1.70	1.68	0.85	!!	100.00%	96.04%	6.29	0.15	4.01	0.09
5	46	46. Re6	M	2	→ 49... Kb4	30	6231	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.02	0.00	‑0.02	‑0.02		99.14%	96.07%	6.36	0.14	4.19	0.10	46	46... c4 !!	M	1	→ 49... Kb4	30	6231	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	2.59	2.59	1.16	!!	100.00%	96.13%	6.29	0.14	4.01	0.09
5	47	47. Re3	M	1	→ 49... Kb4	30	6231	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.16%	6.36	0.14	4.19	0.09	47	47... Kb6 !!	M	1	→ 49... Kb4	30	6231	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	2.26	2.26	1.13	!!	100.00%	96.22%	6.29	0.14	4.01	0.09
5	48	48. g6	M	1	→ 49... Kb4	30	6231	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.24%	6.36	0.14	4.19	0.09	48	48... Kxb5 !!	M	1	→ 49... Kb4	30	6231	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	1.17	1.17	0.74	!!	100.00%	96.30%	6.29	0.14	4.01	0.09
5	49	49. g7	M	1	→ 49... Kb4	30	6231	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00		100.00%	96.32%	6.36	0.14	4.19	0.09	49	49... Kb4 !!	M	1	↓	30	6231	0.00	0.2%	99.6%	0.2%	=	50%	0.00	2.97	2.97	1.15	!!	100.00%	96.38%	6.29	0.13	4.01	0.09

⇑ game 5 — engine evaluated moves ⇑

⇓ game 6 — player data ⇓

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 5
statistics
type	player White	player Black
moves with own (↓) or from following move derived (→) precise engine evaluation	47	48
moves without precise engine evaluation	—	—
phantom moves without own, but from the following move derived (→) engine evaluation	—	1
optimal moves — evaluation gain ≧ 0.00	29	35
suboptimal moves — evaluation loss > 0.00 — evaluation gain < 0.00	18	12
brilliant moves !!	2	8
impressive moves !	—	4
attractive moves !?	11	7
neutral moves — relevant gain/loss <> 0.00	20	19
neutral moves with engine evaluation = 0.00 or for lack of comparative variation ≧ 0.00	6	1
questionable moves ?!	6	6
unsuitable moves ?	1	—
miserable moves ??	1	2
clear advantage — of White: +- — of Black: -+	4	—
moderate advantage — of White: ± — of Black: ∓	5	—
slight advantage — of White: ⩲ — of Black: ⩱	18	—
balanced position — engine evaluation <> 0.00 — =	10	9
balanced position or draw — engine evaluation = 0.00 — =	10	7
slight disadvantage — of White: ⩱ — of Black: ⩲	—	19
moderate disadvantage — of White: ∓ — of Black: ±	—	5
clear disadvantage — of White: -+ — of Black: +-	—	6
extreme disadvantage — of White: --+ — of Black: ++-	—	2
engine evaluation at last move — »evaluation real move«	0.00	0.00
win probability as per WDL at last move — »win probability WDL«	0.2%	0.2%
draw probability as per WDL at last move — »draw probability WDL«	99.6%	99.6%
loss probability as per WDL at last move — »loss probability WDL«	0.2%	0.2%
position evaluation symbol at last move — »position evaluation symbol«	=	=
probabilistic game result at last move in % — »probab. game result«	50%	50%
average optimum rate at last move in % — »optimum rate Ø«	96.32%	96.38%
cumulated absolute losses at last move — »losses ∑ absolute«	6.36	6.29
average absolute losses at last move — »losses Ø absolute«	0.14	0.13
cumulated relevant losses at last move — »losses ∑ relevant«	4.19	4.01
average relevant losses at last move — »losses Ø relevant«	0.09	0.09
moves with engine/calculation-WDL-ERR analysis	47	48

⇑ game 5 — statistics ⇑

⇓ game 6 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 6
player data
PGN tags / evaluation settings	player White	player Black
name	Deep Blue	Kasparov,G

⇑ game 6 — player data ⇑

⇓ game 6 — probabilistic game results ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 6
PGN tags / evaluation settings
PGN tags / evaluation settings	information
event/source/work	IBM Man-Machine
site	New York
date	1997.05.10
round/number/page	06
result	1-0
ECO	B17
annotator	Stockfish dev-20241031-24c57793
scheme move evaluation	7 sectors - 1/7 1/7 1/7 1/14 1/14 1/7 1/7 1/7
scheme position evaluation	9 sectors - 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/18 1/18 1/9 1/9 1/9 1/9
scheme WDL evaluation relevance reduction	as per original engine WDLs or calculation
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.75	1.164 [58x]
average WDL evaluation for probabilistic game result 0.875	1.758 [58x]
variations: general parameters	2 — for White/Black — from/until move no. 3 until end of game
variations: analysis stop parameter	depth 30 half-moves
FEN position before Variations start	rnbqkbnr/pp2pppp/2p5/3p4/3PP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 3 d7d5

⇑ game 6 — PGN tags / evaluation settings ⇑

⇓ game 6 — engine evaluated moves ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 6
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

⇑ game 6 — probabilistic game results ⇑

⇓ game 6 — statistics ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 6
engine-evaluated moves
game no.	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = variation x	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant	move no.	game move	multi/ single mode	game move = x.variation	move evaluation source	search depth hm	tablebase hits	evaluation real move	win probability WDL	draw probability WDL	loss probability WDL	position evaluation symbol	probab. game result	evaluation optimal move	evaluation 2^nd best move	gain/ loss absolute	gain/ loss relevant	move evaluation symbol	optimum rate	optimum rate Ø	losses ∑ absolute	losses Ø absolute	losses ∑ relevant	losses Ø relevant
6																									2	2... d5	P	—	→ 3. e5	30	—	0.42	1.2%	84.9%	13.9%	⩲ +/=	56%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
6	3	3. Nc3	M	2	→ 4... Nf6	30	—	0.26	7.9%	90.6%	1.5%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.42	0.26	‑0.16	‑0.14		94.66%	94.66%	0.16	0.16	0.14	0.14	3	3... dxe4 !?	M	1	→ 4... Nf6	30	—	0.26	1.5%	90.6%	7.9%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.26	0.56	0.30	0.26	!?	100.00%	100.00%	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
6	4	4. Nxe4 !?	M	1	→ 4... Nf6	30	—	0.26	7.9%	90.6%	1.5%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.26	‑0.14	0.40	0.39	!?	100.00%	97.33%	0.16	0.08	0.14	0.07	4	4... Nd7	M	>2	→ 5. Bd3	30	—	0.34	1.2%	88.7%	10.1%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.26	0.32	‑0.08	‑0.07		97.23%	98.62%	0.08	0.04	0.07	0.04
6	5	5. Ng5	M	>2	→ 5... h6	30	—	0.24	7.5%	90.9%	1.6%	⩲ +/=	53%	0.34	0.29	‑0.10	‑0.09		96.53%	97.06%	0.26	0.09	0.23	0.08	5	5... Ngf6	M	2	→ 6... g6	30	—	0.32	1.3%	89.2%	9.5%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.24	0.32	‑0.08	‑0.07		97.21%	98.15%	0.16	0.05	0.14	0.05
6	6	6. Bd3 !?	M	1	→ 6... g6	30	—	0.32	9.5%	89.2%	1.3%	⩲ +/=	54%	0.32	0.07	0.25	0.24	!?	100.00%	97.80%	0.26	0.07	0.23	0.06	6	6... e6	M	2	→ 7... Bd6	30	—	0.40	1.0%	86.9%	12.1%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.32	0.40	‑0.08	‑0.07		97.30%	97.94%	0.24	0.06	0.21	0.05
6	7	7. N1f3 !?	M	1	→ 7... Bd6	30	—	0.40	12.1%	86.9%	1.0%	⩲ +/=	56%	0.40	0.12	0.28	0.26	!?	100.00%	98.24%	0.26	0.05	0.23	0.05	7	7... h6 ?!	M	>2	→ 8... fxe6	30	—	0.91	0.1%	57.1%	42.8%	+-	71%	0.40	0.52	‑0.51	‑0.37	?!	84.42%	95.23%	0.75	0.15	0.58	0.12
6	8	8. Nxe6 !?	M	1	→ 8... fxe6	30	—	0.91	42.8%	57.1%	0.1%	+-	71%	0.91	0.29	0.62	0.47	!?	100.00%	98.53%	0.26	0.04	0.23	0.04	8	8... Qe7 ?!	M	2	→ 11... Qb4	30	—	2.04	0.0%	2.1%	97.9%	++-	99%	0.91	2.04	‑1.13	‑0.34	?!	84.13%	93.38%	1.88	0.31	0.92	0.15
6	9	9. O‑O !!	M	1	→ 11... Qb4	30	—	2.04	97.9%	2.1%	0.0%	++-	99%	2.04	‑1.55	3.59	1.79	!!	100.00%	98.74%	0.26	0.04	0.23	0.03	9	9... fxe6	M	1	→ 11... Qb4	30	—	2.04	0.0%	2.1%	97.9%	++-	99%	2.04	3.58	1.54	0.01		100.00%	94.33%	1.88	0.27	0.92	0.13
6	10	10. Bg6+ !	M	1	→ 11... Qb4	30	—	2.04	97.9%	2.1%	0.0%	++-	99%	2.04	0.56	1.48	0.63	!	100.00%	98.90%	0.26	0.03	0.23	0.03	10	10... Kd8	M	1	→ 11... Qb4	30	—	2.04	0.0%	2.1%	97.9%	++-	99%	2.04	5.40	3.36	0.01		100.00%	95.04%	1.88	0.23	0.92	0.12
6	11	11. Bf4 !?	M	1	→ 11... Qb4	30	—	2.04	97.9%	2.1%	0.0%	++-	99%	2.04	1.11	0.93	0.20	!?	100.00%	99.02%	0.26	0.03	0.23	0.03	11	11... b5	M	>2	→ 12. Bg3	30	—	2.52	0.0%	0.4%	99.6%	++-	100%	2.04	2.10	‑0.48	‑0.01		99.71%	95.56%	2.36	0.26	0.93	0.10
6	12	12. a4	M	>2	→ 12... a6	30	—	2.48	99.6%	0.4%	0.0%	++-	100%	2.52	2.23	‑0.04	0.00		99.99%	99.12%	0.30	0.03	0.23	0.02	12	12... Bb7	M	>2	→ 14... a5	30	—	2.62	0.0%	0.3%	99.7%	++-	100%	2.48	2.53	‑0.14	0.00		99.99%	96.00%	2.50	0.25	0.93	0.09
6	13	13. Re1	M	1	→ 14... a5	30	—	2.62	99.7%	0.3%	0.0%	++-	100%	2.62	2.18	0.44	0.00		100.00%	99.20%	0.30	0.03	0.23	0.02	13	13... Nd5	M	1	→ 14... a5	30	—	2.62	0.0%	0.3%	99.7%	++-	100%	2.27	2.62	‑0.35	0.00		99.94%	96.36%	2.85	0.26	0.93	0.08
6	14	14. Bg3 !!	M	1	→ 14... a5	30	—	2.62	99.7%	0.3%	0.0%	++-	100%	2.62	0.29	2.33	1.08	!!	100.00%	99.27%	0.30	0.03	0.23	0.02	14	14... Kc8	M	2	→ 15. Qd3	30	2	3.10	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	2.62	3.10	‑0.48	0.00		100.00%	96.66%	3.33	0.28	0.93	0.08
6	15	15. axb5	M	2	→ 16. Rc1	30	—	3.44	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	3.44	3.10	0.34	0.00		100.00%	99.32%	0.30	0.02	0.23	0.02	15	15... cxb5	M	1	→ 16. Rc1	30	—	3.44	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	3.44	4.70	1.26	0.00		100.00%	96.92%	3.33	0.26	0.93	0.07
6	16	16. Qd3	M	>2	→ 17. Rec1	30	—	3.71	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	3.44	3.17	0.27	0.00		100.00%	99.37%	0.30	0.02	0.23	0.02	16	16... Bc6	M	1	→ 17. Rec1	30	—	3.71	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	3.52	3.71	‑0.19	0.00		100.00%	97.14%	3.52	0.25	0.93	0.07
6	17	17. Bf5	M	2	→ 18... Nxe7	30	316	3.66	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	3.71	3.66	‑0.05	0.00		100.00%	99.41%	0.35	0.02	0.23	0.02	17	17... exf5	M	1	→ 18... Nxe7	30	316	3.66	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	3.66	4.38	0.72	0.00		100.00%	97.33%	3.52	0.23	0.93	0.06
6	18	18. Rxe7 !!	M	1	→ 18... Nxe7	30	316	3.66	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	3.66	0.00	3.66	1.16	!!	100.00%	99.45%	0.35	0.02	0.23	0.01	18	18... Bxe7	M	2	→ 19. c4	30	1938	4.99	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	++-	100%	3.66	4.99	‑1.33	0.00		100.00%	97.50%	4.85	0.30	0.93	0.06
6	19	19. c4	M	1	↓	30	1938	4.99	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	++-	100%	4.99	1.43	3.56	0.04		100.00%	99.48%	0.35	0.02	0.23	0.01

⇑ game 6 — engine evaluated moves ⇑

⇓ game 6 — end ⇓

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 6
statistics
type	player White	player Black
moves with own (↓) or from following move derived (→) precise engine evaluation	17	17
moves without precise engine evaluation	—	—
phantom moves without own, but from the following move derived (→) engine evaluation	—	1
optimal moves — evaluation gain ≧ 0.00	13	5
suboptimal moves — evaluation loss > 0.00 — evaluation gain < 0.00	4	11
brilliant moves !!	3	—
impressive moves !	1	—
attractive moves !?	5	1
neutral moves — relevant gain/loss <> 0.00	3	6
neutral moves with engine evaluation = 0.00 or for lack of comparative variation ≧ 0.00	5	7
questionable moves ?!	—	2
extreme advantage — of White: ++- — of Black: --+	11	—
clear advantage — of White: +- — of Black: -+	1	—
slight advantage — of White: ⩲ — of Black: ⩱	5	—
slight disadvantage — of White: ⩱ — of Black: ⩲	—	5
clear disadvantage — of White: -+ — of Black: +-	—	1
extreme disadvantage — of White: --+ — of Black: ++-	—	11
engine evaluation at last move — »evaluation real move«	4.99	4.99
win probability as per WDL at last move — »win probability WDL«	100.0%	0.0%
draw probability as per WDL at last move — »draw probability WDL«	0.0%	0.0%
loss probability as per WDL at last move — »loss probability WDL«	0.0%	100.0%
position evaluation symbol at last move — »position evaluation symbol«	++-	++-
probabilistic game result at last move in % — »probab. game result«	100%	100%
average optimum rate at last move in % — »optimum rate Ø«	99.48%	97.50%
cumulated absolute losses at last move — »losses ∑ absolute«	0.35	4.85
average absolute losses at last move — »losses Ø absolute«	0.02	0.30
cumulated relevant losses at last move — »losses ∑ relevant«	0.23	0.93
average relevant losses at last move — »losses Ø relevant«	0.01	0.06
moves with engine/calculation-WDL-ERR analysis	17	17

⇑ game 6 — statistics ⇑

PGN-Engine-Analyzer variations file:F:\konrod.info\Schach\Kommentiertes\Engine-Varianten\Kasparov_Deep_Blue_1997_1_6.pgnfrom 1 December 2024 09:36analysis date: 9 April 2025 08:12

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue result: 1-0

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue result: 1-0

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue result: 1-0

game 1probabilistic game resultsfrom the perspective of White

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue result: 1-0

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

game 2probabilistic game resultsfrom the perspective of White

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

game 3probabilistic game resultsfrom the perspective of White

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1/2-1/2

game 4probabilistic game resultsfrom the perspective of White

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

game 5probabilistic game resultsfrom the perspective of White

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

game 6probabilistic game resultsfrom the perspective of White

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G result: 1-0

PGN-Engine-Analyzer variations file:
F:\konrod.info\Schach\Kommentiertes\Engine-Varianten\Kasparov_Deep_Blue_1997_1_6.pgn
from 1 December 2024 09:36
analysis date: 9 April 2025 08:12

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

game 1
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

G Kasparov ./. Deep Blue
result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 2
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 3
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

game 4
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

game 5
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

Kasparov,G ./. Deep Blue
result: 1/2-1/2

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

game 6
probabilistic game results
from the perspective of White

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0

Deep Blue ./. Kasparov,G
result: 1-0